A REAL-WORLD ASSESSMENT OF THE CLINICAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACT OF POWERED VS MANUAL ENDOSCOPIC STAPLERS WHEN USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH BUTTRESS IN BARIATRIC SURGERY

Author(s)

Lim S1, Roy S1, Yadalam S2, Johnston S3
1Ethicon Inc, Somerville, NJ, USA, 2Johnson & Johnson Co., New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 3Johnson & Johnson, Inc., New Brunswick, NJ, USA

OBJECTIVES: Surgeons often use buttress material to reinforce staple lines as a preventive measure against potential leaks and bleeding. It is unknown whether powered endoscopic stapling technology performs differentially from manual technology when used in conjunction with buttress. In this post-hoc sub-analysis of a previously-published study, we compared clinical and economic outcomes of powered vs. manual endoscopic staplers when used in conjunction with buttress in bariatric surgery.

METHODS: Using the Premier Healthcare Database of US hospital discharge records, we selected patients who underwent a primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (between 1/1/2012-9/30/2015) with concomitant use of buttress and powered or manual endoscopic surgical staplers. Outcomes were: bleeding/transfusion; operating room (OR) time; hospital length of stay (LOS); total hospital, medical/surgical supply, room and board, and OR costs; discharge status; and 30/60/90-day all-cause readmissions. We used generalized estimating equations accounting for hospital-level clustering and adjusting for patient/provider/hospital characteristics to compare outcomes between powered and manual stapler groups; sub-analyses compared the powered staplers (all of which were Ethicon) to manual staplers by brand (Ethicon/Medtronic).

RESULTS: Study included: 2,259 patients with powered staplers (all Ethicon) and buttress, 3,195 patients with manual staplers and buttress (1,925 Ethicon, 1,324 Medtronic; 54 had both). Powered staplers were associated with 17.0% lower adjusted room and board cost compared with manual staplers ($1,755 vs. $2,114, p=0.005); differences in all other economic and clinical outcomes were not statistically significant. Within sub-analyses, powered staplers were associated with: 14.5% lower adjusted room and board costs compared with Ethicon manual ($1,734 vs. $2,028, p=0.009); 30.4% lower adjusted supply cost ($4,480 vs. $6,437, p=0.001) and 20.1% lower adjusted total hospital cost ($11,856 vs. $14,832, p=0.009) compared with Medtronic manual.

CONCLUSIONS: In this post-hoc sub-analysis, use of powered staplers with buttress was associated with cost saving compared with manual staplers with buttress.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-05, ISPOR 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S1 (May 2018)

Code

MD1

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×