COMPARISON OF TREND, OUTCOME, AND COST OF OPEN, LAPAROSCOPIC, AND ROBOTIC SURGICAL TREATMENT FOR COLORECTAL CANCER- A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS OF A NATIONAL DATABASE

Author(s)

Chiu C1, Lee MG2, Hsu W2, Lee S2, Hsu T2, Lee C3
1Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan, 2National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, 3National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch, Douliou, Taiwan

OBJECTIVES:  There are limited studies compare the outcomes and costs of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgeries in a nationally representative population database. Our study aims to compare the inpatient outcomes among colon cancer patients undergoing these three types of surgeries. METHODS:  A retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample database from 2008 to 2012 was performed. We identified the robotic, laparoscopic, and open procedures by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) procedure codes and grouped them into categories by procedure type. We compared the in-hospital mortalities, complications, length of stays, and costs for patients undergoing open, laparoscopic or robotic surgeries. The outcomes and costs of the different surgical modalities were adjusted using propensity score. RESULTS: Of the 499,724 weighted number of colorectal surgeries performed during the study period, 371,463 (74.3%) were open surgeries, 120,615 (24.1%) were laparoscopic surgeries, and 7,646 (1.53%)
were robotic surgeries. In comparison with laparoscopic surgeries after propensity score adjustment, open surgeries was associated with 2.6 fold increase in risk of in-hospital mortality, 17% increase in risk of wound complications, 63% increase in general medical complications, 58% increase in risk of general surgical complications, 2.5 fold increase in risk in longer hospital stay, and higher total cost ($ 16,901 vs $ 13,723) than laparoscopic surgery.
The outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic surgery are generally comparable after propensity score adjustment, except for in-hospital mortality and costs. Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries have 3.6 fold increase in risk of in-hospital mortality, and lower cost ($13,134 vs $19,187) than robotic surgery. CONCLUSIONS:  Minimally invasive robotic and laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgeries have fewer complications, lower in-patient mortality, and shorter hospital stays. Their use in colorectal cancer surgery should increase with efforts to improve the outcome. Additional studies are needed to better delineate the comparative and cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery relative to laparoscopic surgery.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-10, ISPOR Europe 2016, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 7 (November 2016)

Code

PCN81

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×