EVALUATING THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF GLP-1 RECEPTOR AGONISTS FOR THE TREATMENT OF TYPE 2 DIABETES IN THE UK

Author(s)

Ashley D1, Vega G1, Hunt B2, Valentine WJ2
1Novo Nordisk Ltd., Gatwick, UK, 2Ossian Health Economics and Communications, Basel, Switzerland

OBJECTIVES: Key challenges in the adequate management of type 2 diabetes include maintaining glycemic control whilst minimizing the risk of hypoglycemia, without increasing body weight.  Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists provide a multi-factorial approach to treatment, compared with traditional glucocentric approaches.  The present analysis aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of diabetes in the UK.

METHODS: Changes in glycated hemoglobin, blood pressure and body mass index upon initiation of liraglutide 1.2mg, exenatide BID and lixisenatide were taken from a network meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on oral antidiabetic drugs.  Patient lifetime projections of clinical outcomes and direct costs (taken from published UK-specific sources, 2013 GBP) were made in a cohort based on the LEAD-6 trial using a published and validated diabetes model.  Outcomes were discounted at 3.5% annually.  Sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS: Liraglutide was associated with improved quality-adjusted life expectancy versus exenatide (9.17 versus 9.16 quality-adjusted life years [QALYs]) and lixisenatide (9.17 versus 9.12 QALYs).  Improvements were driven by improved glycemic control, leading to a reduced incidence of diabetes-related complications.  Liraglutide was associated with reduced costs versus exenatide (GBP37,520 versus GBP37,607) with cost savings as a result of avoided diabetes-related complications entirely offsetting increased acquisition costs.  Versus lixisenatide, liraglutide was associated with increased costs (GBP37,520 versus GBP37,126), driven by increased acquisition costs which were partially offset by reduced costs of treatment of complications.  Based on the projected outcomes, liraglutide was found to be dominant over exenatide and associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of GBP7,367 per QALY gained versus lixisenatide.

CONCLUSIONS: Liraglutide 1.2mg is likely to be considered cost-effective or cost-saving versus alternative GLP-1 receptor agonists for treatment of diabetes in the UK.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2015-11, ISPOR Europe 2015, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 7 (November 2015)

Code

PDB54

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×