BASAL INSULIN REGIMENS- SYSTEMATIC REVIEW, NETWORK META-ANALYSIS, AND COST - UTILITY ANALYSIS FOR THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE (NICE) CLINICAL GUIDELINE ON TYPE 1 DIABETES MELLITUS IN ADULTS
Author(s)
Dawoud D1, Fenu E1, Wonderling D1, O'Mahony R1, Pursey N1, Cobb J1, Amiel SA2, Higgins B3
1National Clinical Guideline Centre, Royal College of Physicians (on behalf of the guideline development group), London, UK, 2King's College London, London, UK, 3Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle, UK
OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of basal insulin regimens for adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), from the English National Health Service (NHS) perspective, and inform NICE recommendation regarding optimal choice of basal insulin. METHODS: We considered seven daily insulin regimens: neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) (once (od), twice (bid) and four-times daily (qid)), detemir (od and bid), glargine (od) and degludec (od). A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases to August 2014 was undertaken. Relative effectiveness was assessed using Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) undertaken in WinBUGs. Two outcomes were analysed: change in haemoglobin A1c (HbA) and rate of severe/major hypoglycaemia. The cost-utility analysis (CUA) was undertaken using the IMS-CORE Diabetes Model (IMS-CDM), following NICE reference case (lifetime time horizon, 3.5% discount rate for both costs and QALYs (quality-adjusted life-years), net monetary benefit (NMB) calculated using a threshold of £20,000 per QALY gained). Sensitivity analyses were performed; including changing insulin dose, discount rate and cost of hypoglycaemic events. RESULTS: Twenty eight RCTs were included in the NMA. The mean change in HbAranged from -0.48% (SE=0.10) for detemir-(bid) to –0.01% (SE=0.17) for NPH-(qid). Mean rate of severe/major hypoglycaemia ranged from 29 (95%CI: 0.00 to 39.76) to 35 (95%CI: 0.00 to 46.73) events/100 person-years. The CUA showed that detemir-(bid) had the highest mean QALY-gain (11.09) and NMB (£181,456) per patient. Insulin glargine-(od) ranked second. Insulin degludec-(od) was the most costly, with the highest treatment cost (£7,169). The optimal choice was robust to all changes except when high doses of detemir-(bid) were assumed (>30% increment compared to other regimens); where glargine-(od) ranked first. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin detemir administered twice daily was the optimal basal regimen for adults with T1DM from the English NHS perspective; providing the highest QALY gain and NMB among the regimens considered.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2015-11, ISPOR Europe 2015, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 7 (November 2015)
Code
CE1
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders