USE AND FINDINGS OF K-RAS IN COLORECTAL CANCER (CRC) TESTING IN ADMINISTRATIVE AND ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS (EMR) DATA FROM 2005 THROUGH 2010
Author(s)
Seal B1, Sullivan SD2, Ramsey S3, Kreilick C4, Foltz-Boklage S4, Haslip S5, Gilmore J5, Sarma S6, Asche C7, Valluri S11Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pine Brook, NJ, USA, 2University of Washington, Seattle , WA, USA, 3Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 4Bayer HealthCare, Wayne, NJ, USA, 5Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta, GA, US, Atlanta, GA, USA, 6Independent Consultant, Wilmington, NC, USA, 7University of Illinois, Peoria, IL, USA
OBJECTIVES: The use of K-ras testing in clinical decision-making has grown over the past few years. The objective of this study was to evaluate, in a real world context, the trends and diagnostic findings of K-ras testing using managed care and EMR data. METHODS: The Georgia Cancer Specialists Database EMR (2005-2010) and administrative data from the MarketScan and IMPACT database(s) was used to select patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (CRC). We looked for trends in use of K-ras in relation to timing of chemotherapy administration. The EMR data provided information on k-ras mutation type. RESULTS: In MarketScan, of the 23,548 patients with a diagnosis of CRC, 1,730 (7.3%) patients had a test ordered for K-ras between 2005 and 2010. The number of patients receiving K-ras increased with line of therapy: first line 336 patients (8.2%) of 4098 treated, second line 455 patients (15.2%) of 2984 treated, and third line 529 patients (33%) of 1603 treated. We found similar results using the IMPACT database: 2,256 (7.8%) CRC patients had a test ordered for K-ras between 2005 and 2010. K-ras testing increased with line of therapy: first line 244 patients (7.8%), second line 510 (14.6%), and third line 650 patients (33.1%). EMR lab results from stage IV disease (n=349) consisted of 15% mutated type, 60% unknown and 25% wild type. For confirmed test results wild type represented 62.5% and mutated type 37.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Over the last six years, use of K-ras testing has increased in use in patients with CRC. The increase has occurred in later lines of therapy. The timing occurring late in therapy may limit the use of agents specific for this test.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2012-06, ISPOR 2012, Washington, D.C., USA
Value in Health, Vol. 15, No. 4 (June 2012)
Code
PMD5
Topic
Epidemiology & Public Health
Topic Subcategory
Disease Classification & Coding
Disease
Oncology