WHAT IS THE PROPORTION OF PATIENTS WHO RETURN COUNTER REFERRAL SLIPS TO THE ORIGINAL REFERRAL SERVICE FOR CONFIRMATION OF ARRIVAL TO THE HOSPITAL?

Author(s)

Mogere DM1, Loum CS1, Kaseje D2
1Great Lakes University of Kisumu, KISUMU, Kenya, 2Great Lakes University of Kisumu, Kisumu, Kenya

OBJECTIVES Counter referral success rate is defined as number of patients received back at the original referring service with counter referral slips divided by the total number of patients referred and received at the referral hospital. Study objective was to determine the number of patients who returned counter referral slips to the original referral service for confirmation of arrival to the hospital. METHODS Quasi -experimental study was carried out in two sub- locations in Kenya where hundred community health workers were trained on community based referral and counter referral model and issued with referral tools. Each was assigned 25 households, instructed to regularly visit them in order to identify sick persons counsel and refer them to link hospitals. One hundred villages comprising 2209 households with a population of 11,000 people were covered where the counter referral model was implemented. RESULTS During the 12 months of implementation, a total of 322 patients were identified, counseled and referred to link hospitals of whom 93% (298/322) arrived the hospitals with referral and counter referral slips. The study showed that forty six percent (138/298) of counter referral slips had the name, signature and date of referring health worker, only 12 % (35/298) indicated CHW’s telephone contact. Forty one percent (121/298) had the name and signature of attending physician of which 96% (116/121) had hospital stamp. Further, forty seven percent (140/298) of the patients returned counter referral slips to the original referral service for confirmation of arrival at the referral hospital. Fifty one percent (117/228) were satisfied with referral and counter referral process. CONCLUSIONS It is concluded that referral and counter referral model is both feasible and acceptable. However, referral protocols and other resources are necessary for the process to be successful. Further, both ends should be willing and prepared to receive those being referred there.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-11, ISPOR Europe 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)

Code

PHP180

Topic

Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Health Care Research

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×