MAPPING FACT-P TO EQ-5D IN METASTATIC CASTRATION-RESISTANT PROSTATE CANCER (MCRPC)- PERFORMANCE OF A PREVIOUSLY DEVELOPED ALGORITHM WHEN APPLIED ON A SAMPLE WITH A DIFFERENT DISEASE STAGE

Author(s)

Ivanescu C1, Longworth L2, Skaltsa K3, Holmstrom S4
1Quintiles Consulting, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands, 2Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK, 3Quintiles Consulting, Barcelona, Spain, 4HEOR, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Leiden, The Netherlands

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the predictive performance of a previously published mapping algorithm for converting the prostate cancer specific instrument FACT-P (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Prostate) to EQ-5D utility values (UK tariff) on a sample with a different disease stage than the one on which the model was generated [Skaltsa et. al. ViH 2014]. METHODS: We applied a previously developed algorithm to the data obtained from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial in asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic chemo-naïve mCRPC patients. The trial collected EQ-5D and FACT-P data at baseline and until treatment discontinuation. The mapping model was developed on mCRPC patients in a post-chemo setting, included the FACT-P subscale scores and baseline variables and used separate algorithms for patients with good and poor health defined as a FACT-P score exceeding or not 76. Model performance was assessed by mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE).  RESULTS: The testing dataset contained 1,669 patients with baseline and ≥1 post-baseline scores. The average baseline EQ-5D utility and FACT-P total score were 0.844 and 119.5 respectively. Percentage of perfect health was 37% across all visits (ceiling effect). The average (across all visits) observed and predicted EQ-5D utility index value was 0.823 and 0.842, respectively. The model yields accurate predictions (MAE=0.107; RMSE=0.150) comparable to the ones obtained on the development sample (MAE=0.117; RMSE=0.162). The model predicts well for milder health states, but overpredicts for the more severe ones (EQ-5D utility≤0.5: MAE=0.436, RMSE=0.258; EQ-5D utility > 0.5: MAE=0.096, RMSE=0.125). CONCLUSIONS: Although external validation is recommended using similar samples, our findings show that the algorithm developed in the post-chemo setting performed well in a pre-chemo setting in mCRPC patients, although overpredicts for severe states. This model seems suitable for predicting utility values for economic evaluation when a preference-based measure is absent in chemo-naïve mCRPC populations.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-11, ISPOR Europe 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)

Code

PRM138

Topic

Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

PRO & Related Methods

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×