AN ASSESSMENT OF THE CURRENT LITERATURE ON APHERESIS USE IN THE TREATMENT OF FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA
Author(s)
Wang A1, Richhariya A2, Gandra SR2, Calimlim B1, Kim L1, Nordyke R1
1ICON, El Segundo, CA, USA, 2Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
OBJECTIVES Although apheresis is an important treatment for reducing LDL-C in familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) patients, little is known about its treatment patterns. We conducted a systematic review to assess the efficacy/effectiveness, practice patterns, cost, and clinical guidelines for apheresis in FH patients. METHODS Electronic databases were searched for publications of apheresis in FH patients. Inclusion criteria include: articles in English published 2000-2013, description of practice patterns, efficacy/effectiveness, and costs. Data were stratified by country and FH genotype where possible. RESULTS Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria: 8 open-label clinical trials, 11 observational studies, 16 reviews/guidelines, and 2 health technology assessments. Of the 19 clinical and observational studies, 6 assessed only homozygous FH (HoFH) patients, 4 assessed only heterozygous FH (HeFH) patients, 6 included HoFH and HeFH patients, and 3 did not specify type of FH. The prevalence of FH is not well characterized by country and underdiagnosis is a barrier to optimal FH treatment. Apheresis guidelines recommend weekly/bi-weekly treatments conducted at apheresis centers that may last ≥ 3 hours per session. Apheresis may be recommended as first-line treatment in HoFH patients and after drug therapy failure in HeFH patients. Studies reported a range of LDL-C reduction after apheresis: HoFH: 57-75%; HeFH: 58-63%. Eight studies reported apheresis costs. Cost (USD 2013) per apheresis session ranged from $2,200-$4,300 in the US, $2,150-$2,600 in the UK, $1700-$1850 in Germany and France, and $2,350-$2,750 in Australia. Calculated annual costs may reach $88,400-$225,000 per patient for weekly treatment. CONCLUSIONS LDL-C apheresis treatment is necessary for FH patients when drug therapy is inadequate. While apheresis reduces LDL-C, high per-session costs and the frequency of guideline-recommended treatment result in substantial annual costs. The costs and the inconvenience of apheresis sessions are barriers in optimal treatment of FH.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2014-11, ISPOR Europe 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)
Code
PCV9
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Epidemiology & Public Health
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Disease Classification & Coding
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders