A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW TO IDENTIFY TRIALS IN FIRST-LINE RAS WILD-TYPE (WT) METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER (MCRC) PATIENTS

Author(s)

Jarrett J1, Weijers L2, Hnoosh A3, Harty G3, von Hohnhorst P4
1MAPI, London, UK, 2Mapi - HEOR & Strategic Market Access, Houten, The Netherlands, 3Merck Serono Ltd., Feltham, UK, 4Merck Serono, Darmstadt, Germany

OBJECTIVES The aim was at assembling published evidence on treatments for RAS wild-type (wt) (KRAS and NRAS exon 2,3,4) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab in combination with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI chemotherapy as first line treatment of these patients. The outcomes of interest were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response (ORR), and adverse event data METHODS A systematic literature search was performed on the 24th March 2014 in Medline, Embase, and The Cochrane Library to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as well as single arm trials concerning the efficacy and safety of first line interventions of interest in patients with RAS wt mCRC. Abstract and article selection was performed by two independent researchers, with a third person resolving disagreements, according to predefined standards, which were based on criteria for patient, intervention, comparator, outcomes and study design (PICOS) RESULTS

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-11, ISPOR Europe 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)

Code

PCN16

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×