Pharmacoeconomic Guidelines: El Salvador

Country/Region: El Salvador
Submission Guidelines
Submission Guidelines Source:
Additional Information:

Downloadable Templates
https://www.salud.gob.sv/unidad-de-evaluacion-de-tecnologias-sanitarias/#DOC-DESCARGA

ANNEX No.1: REQUEST FOR INCLUSION OF MEDICATIONS IN THE INSTITUTIONAL LIST

ANNEX No.2: DECLARATION OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST FORM FOR APPLICANTS SEEKING INCLUSION OF MEDICATIONS IN THE INSTITUTIONAL LIST

ANNEX No.3: EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS BY THE LOCAL PHARMACOTHERAPEUTIC COMMITTEE FOR INCLUSION OF MEDICATIONS IN THE INSTITUTIONAL LIST

ANNEX No.4: REVIEWS, TRIALS, STUDIES, AND EVALUATION FOR THE INSTITUTIONAL LIST

ANNEX No.5: REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION OR MODIFICATION OF MEDICATIONS FROM THE INSTITUTIONAL LIST

ANNEX No.6: FORM FOR REQUESTING INCLUSION, EXCLUSION, OR MODIFICATION OF MEDICAL SURGICAL SUPPLIES

ANNEX No.7: FORM FOR REQUESTING CODES FROM SUB-CATALOG 6 OF SINAB: MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS, MEDICAL EQUIPMENT, AND CLINICAL FURNITURE

 

Information current as of Wednesday, January 31, 2024

Key Features

Type of Guidelines Submission Guidelines
Title and year of the document Technical guidelines for health technology evaluations
Affiliation of authors Francisco Alabi (Minister of Health), Carlos Albarenga (Viceminister of Health), and Karla Diaz (Viceministry of Health Operations)
Purpose of the document To establish the provisions for the evaluation of health technologies aimed at the inclusion, modification and exclusion of health technologies to the Institutional List of Medicines Essentials (LIME) and catalogs managed by the Directorate of Health Technologies (DIRTECS)
Standard reporting format included Yes (Annex)
Disclosure Not stated.
Target audience of funding/ author's interests Healthcare professionals within Ministry of Health involved in the inclusion of new healthcare technologies.
Perspective Public Healthcare System Perspective.
Indication Yes
Target population Yes
Subgroup analysis Not defined.
Choice of comparator Other therapies for the same indication.
Time horizon 1 year (Budget Impact).
Assumptions required Not defined.
Preferred analytical technique Not defined.
Costs to be included Cost per unit, cost per day, and cost per treatment.
Source of costs Not defined.
Modeling Not defined.
Systematic review of evidences Systematic reviews and meta-analysis preferred as evidence, but not limited to them.
Preference for effectiveness over efficacy Not defined.
Preferred outcome measure Not defined.
Preferred method to derive utility Not defined.
Equity issues stated No.
Discounting costs Not defined.
Discounting outcomes No.
Sensitivity analysis-parameters and range Not defined.
Sensitivity analysis-methods Not defined.
Presenting results Free text.
Incremental analysis No.
Total costs vs effectiveness (cost/effectiveness ratio) No.
Portability of results (Generalizability) Not defined.
Financial impact analysis Basic budget impact based on cost-per-patient and number of patients to be treated.
Mandatory or recommended or voluntary Mandatory.

Acknowledgement:

Fernando Bonilla Sinibaldi, MD, MBA, MSc, Health Economist/Chief Consultant, Health Transformers 360, Guatemala 
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×