GRP logo
Mapping to Estimate Health-State Utility from Non-Preference-Based Outcome Measures

Mapping to Estimate Health-State Utility from Non-Preference-Based Outcome Measures: An ISPOR Good Practices for Outcomes Research Task Force Report

The citation for this report is:
Wailoo AJ, Hernandez-Alava M, Manca A, et al. Mapping to Estimate Health-State Utility from Non–Preference-Based Outcome Measures: An ISPOR Good Practices for Outcomes Research Task Force Report. Value Health 2017; 20(1):18-27.

Editorial: New ISPOR Recommendations - Mapping Methods for Estimation of Health State Utility
Sorrel E. Wolowacz, PhD, Head European Health Economics, RTI Health Solutions, Manchester, UK

Erratum to Mapping to Estimate Health-State Utility from Non-Preference-Based Outcome Measures: An ISPOR Good Practices for Outcomes Research Task Force Report. Value in Health 2017;20(1):18-27.

Chair: Allan Wailoo, PhD, Professor of Health Economics, University of Sheffield; Director, NICE Decision Support Unit, Sheffield, England, UK; Co-editor, Value in Health

Leadership Group:
Marc Botteman, MS, MA, Partner, Pharmerit International, Bethesda, MD, USA
Jan J.V. Busschbach, PhD, Professor & Chair of the section, Medical Psychology & Psychotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center; Senior Investigator, Viersprong Institute for Studies of Personality Disorders (VISPD), Halsteren, Netherlands
Bruce Crawford, MA, MPH, Senior Principal, Real World Evidence Solutions, IMS Health KK, Tokyo, Japan
Andrea Manca, PhD, MSc, Professor, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, England, UK
Monica Hernandez-Alava, BSc, MSc, PhD, Research Fellow in Econometrics, Health Economics and Decision Science (HEDS), ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
Aurelio Mejia, MSc, Deputy Director of Health Technology Assessment, Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud, Bogotá, Colombia
Joshua Ray, MSc, Head of Health Economics Modelling, F. Hoffman-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland

Final Report
The task force sent out drafts for review twice during the development process and received verbal comments on work to date during an ISPOR Forum. All comments, many of which were substantive, were read by the task force and addressed as appropriate. The reviewer comments and author responses to the draft report are available upon request to taskforce@ispor.org.


ISPOR Good Practices For Outcomes Research Index