The Official News & Technical Journal Of The International Society For Pharmacoeconomics And Outcomes Research

Modelling the Use of Hospital Services as a Function of Needs and Supply in Italy for Capitation Purpose

Alessio Petrelli, Epidemiology Unit, Piedmont Region, Turin, Italy, Roberta Picariello, Epidemiology Unit, Piedmont Region, Turin, Italy, and Giuseppe Costa, University of Turin, Turin, Italy


In economically developed countries, there has been an increasing interest in the methods used for funding health care, attempting to attain both equity and efficiency. One approach is capitation, which is used in most countries whose health system is based on taxation. Capitation entails determining weights that represent health care needs and which are applied to population subgroups to determine the funds to be assigned to individual residents. Different methods and levels of refinement for capitation have been used worldwide. In many countries, the funds to be distributed are established based on the population’s age structure, whereas in countries with greater experience (e.g., England and Scandinavian countries), more sophisticated formulas which take into account deprivation are used [1].

In Italy, the health system is organised regionally (the country is divided into 20 Regions), and most of the funds for health care are provided by local taxes. The individual Regions are responsible for choosing the specific method that the Regional Health Authority will adopt for funding. In some Regions, only historical expenditure is taken into account, whereas others use basic capitation based on the population’s age. The latter method is used in Piedmont (a region of northwest Italy with approximately 4,000,000 inhabitants). In this Region, we evaluated a method of health care funding by modeling the use of health services as a function of factors of direct and indirect needs and of supply indicators. The model was greatly inspired by the model used in the United Kingdom and is based on the consideration that the criteria used for equitable funding should mainly consider the health status of the population yet that the available data on morbidity are incomplete both geographically and temporally. As a consequence of the incompleteness of these data, in many countries health care is funded on the basis of the use of health services.

In Piedmont, mortality and hospitalisation follow different patterns, as shown in Figures 1 and 2. The distribution of hospitalisation can in large part be explained by variations in the access to health care. The western half of Piedmont is a mountainous region characterised by isolated valleys, which create obstacles to accessing health care, especially emergency care. In funding health care based on the use of health services, there is the risk of also funding inappropriate care; for this reason, “risk adjustment” for taking into account health care needs is of particular importance. Measuring needs is fundamental; in that capitation is the expenditure of an individual for his or her needs. However, morbidity data are insufficient, and a set of indicators of direct and indirect needs must be used. The definition adopted to determine which needs factors are important should include all of the factors that affect the use of health services in a statistically significant manner [2]. Although risk adjustment allows unsatisfied needs, proportion of needs that do not meet demands, to be taken into account, it also includes the effect of the “illegitimate” needs. Variations in efficiency levels, political choices, and all of the supply effects could be considered as illegitimate factors, yet only some of the variability due to supply effects is measurable. Given that the availability of resources is more of a political issue, we focused on the factors to be considered in risk adjustment and the weights to attribute to factors. The main objective of the statistical model was that of weighing legitimate factors of needs after controlling for illegitimate factors of needs, concentrating on the variation generated by legitimate factors more than on the evaluation of the total amount of variability explained by the model.

In the present work, we focus on the critical issues that need to be addressed, as opposed to the actual results of the model. Since the information from the population census database at individual level was insufficient, we conducted an ecologic study based on municipality data. Of the municipalities in Piedmont, 80% have fewer than 3,000 inhabitants, whereas 5% have more than 10,000 inhabitants. The Region’s capital is Turin (population of approximately 900,000 inhabitants). Because a historical population register has been active in Turin since 1971 (collecting demographic information on all residents), we used neighbourhood-level measures for Turin to reduce ecological bias.

We integrated data from several information systems. In particular, the Hospital Discharge Database (data from 2003) was used to measure the use of hospital services, and the Regional Mortality Register (2001), which includes data on the number of deaths at the municipality level, was used to determine direct needs. The 1991 population census and the National Archive of Immigration (2001) were used for indirect needs. As sources for the supply indicator, we used the Regional Hospital Register (2001) and a regional database of distances, which provides information on distances in minutes between individual municipalities in Piedmont (travel by car in normal traffic conditions). We used raw hospitalisation rates as a measure of outcome, mortality rates as a measure of direct needs, and age and a set of socioeconomic data as measures of indirect needs. The socioeconomic parameters (i.e., percentage of the population represented by immigrants, percentage with a low educational level, percentage with a manual job, average number of inhabitants per room, and percentage unemployed) were used because the characteristics on which it is based are proxies of the independent dimensions of the socioeconomic characteristics of a given population. Moreover, expenditure not related to food consumption was used as a proxy of mean income, and population density (i.e., number of inhabitants per km2) was used as an additional possible determinant of the use of health services. The number of hospital beds and the distance from the nearest municipality with a hospital were used as a measure of supply.

We first evaluated whether the assumption of independence among the socioeconomic dimensions was tenable, fitting standard regression models for testing multicollinearity; we then used hierarchical regression models, considering the municipality as level 1 units and the Regional Health Authorities as level 2 units. We used hierarchical models to accurately estimate the uncertainty of clustered data. All covariates were normalised around zero. All of the values of the variance inflation indicator were much lower than 10, indicating that there were few problems with multicollinearity (Table 1), which is consistent with the role of socioeconomic indicators in explaining differences in the dimensions of inequalities in health and in the use of health services.

Table 2 shows the results produced by the hierarchical model. The percentage of the population aged 65-84 years (coeff. 0.25 p < 0.05) and the percentage with a manual job (coeff. 0.06 p < 0.05) were statistically significant, indicating excesses in the use of hospitalisation in these population subgroups. Of the illegitimate factors, distance was inversely associated with hospital use (coeff, -0.159, p < 0.05).

This is the first study in Italy to have estimated weights for the purposes of capitation using socioeconomic factors as indirect measures of need. The significance of the factors of indirect needs suggests that deprivation plays a role in the estimate of needs, especially for the occupational dimension represented by the percentage of the population with a manual job, which contributes to explaining the demand for hospital care. However, in interpreting the results of this study, several limitations need to be mentioned. The analyses were based on data aggregated at the municipality level, which, as known, can produce an ecological bias. In Italy, there are approximately 8100 municipalities distributed in 20 regions, and 15% of these municipalities are located in Piedmont. Although these municipalities have a very low average population, there also exist large urban centres (e.g., Turin and its suburbs and the other capitals of the Region’s provinces). Thus, in addition to the bias related to the aggregation of data, the heterogeneity of the size of the individual municipalities must be taken into account. Studies that have investigated the intensity of the ecological bias in the relationship between socioeconomic factors and health [3, 4] at diverse levels of geographic aggregation have revealed that the regression coefficients are higher in the aggregated analyses, compared to those in the individual analyses, and that they remain stable with varying geographic granularity, whereas the effect of geographic heterogeneity in the estimates is not clear. In Piedmont, to overcome this problem, the possibility of increasing the level of granularity in the census data, beginning with the 2001 census data, is being evaluated.

Another possible limitation concerns the delays in the publication of census data, which did not allow us to use the most recent census (2001). Nonetheless, we assume that only slight changes have occurred in the association between the use of hospital services and socioeconomic levels. It would be useful to integrate socioeconomic indicators with indicators of social networks, which are more sensitive to problems concerning the access to health services related to conditions of isolation. Finally, the problems of a statistical nature should be evaluated more in depth, in particular: 1) the presence and extent of endogeneity, possibly using models based on linear equation systems, and 2) the presence of random slopes, which could possibly be explained in terms of the conceptual suitability of the model used. In particular, the mechanisms underlying the transformation of needs into demand are in no way taken into account in the model. Indicators capable of addressing the propensity towards the consumption of services, which could depend on cultural or environmental factors not explained by the indicators, could be useful in measuring the phenomenon. Moreover, the use of coefficients for implementing mechanisms for the funding of services should take into account, although outside of the statistical model, the diverse costs related to the production and distribution of services, which are difficult to measure. Differences in the costs of managing emergencies due to the terrain of a given area or in the costs of distributing certain services (cleaning, cafeteria, etc.) could be of importance.

Another important aspect is the role that the supply plays in the model. The strong effect of supply let easily imagine a consistent gap between observed and estimated funds. It is unlikely that the political level can decide to use a model that does not consider the concentration of, and distance from health services given this strong difference. The effects of political choices able to make possible a decrease of supply could act over medium-long periods, whereas capitation seems to be more suitable for the funding of current expenses. More general political problems are also not negligible, in particular, those related to the introduction of a rather technical method in decision-making processes.

Finally, it is necessary to better evaluate the implications of an approach that aim to reach an equitable objective under the hypothesis that equity in access is equivalent to equity in health outcome

REFERENCES

  1. Rice N, Smith P. Approaches to capitation and risk adjustment in health care: an international survey. Centre for health economics, University of York, 1999.
  2.  Rice N, Smith P. Capitation and risk adjustment in health care financing: an international progress report. The Milbank 2001;79:81-113.
  3. Soobader M, LeClere FB, Hadden W, Maury B. Using aggregate geographic data to proxy individual socio-economic status: does size matter? Am J Pub Health 2001;91:632-6.
  4. Geronimus AT, Bound J. Use of census-based aggregate variables to proxy for socio-economic group: evidence from national samples. Am J Epidemiol 1998;148:475-86.

  Issues Index | 2005 Issues Index

 

Contact ISPOR @ info@ispor.org  |  View Legal Disclaimer
©2010 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions.
 
Website design by Eagle Systems USA, Inc.