|
ISPOR Avedis Donabedian Outcomes Research Lifetime Achievement Awardee: Kathleen N. Lohr, PhD
This following transcript was taken from the Awards Presentation at the Second Plenary
Session of the ISPOR 10h Annual International Meeting, on May 17, 2004, Washington
DC, USA. Avedis Donabedian Award Committee Chairman Bryan Luce, PhD, MBA
presented the award to 2005 recipient Kathleen N. Lohr, PhD. Below, is Dr. Luce’s
presentation, followed by Dr. Lohr’s acceptance speech.
Bryan Luce PhD, MBA
First, I want to recognize my fellow committee members: Penny
Erickson, Kevin Schulman and Adrian Towse. Dan Mullins was an
unofficial committee member and was also helpful in the
selection process. We had a difficult time this year in that we
had an extraordinary slate of qualified candidates.
It gives me extreme pleasure to announce that the ISPOR
Avedis Donabedian Outcomes Research Lifetime Achievement Awardee
this year is Dr. Kathleen N. Lohr. Kathy, as she is known to all
her many friends and colleagues, exemplifies the work, the
aspirations and the achievements of Dr. Donabedian.

Dr. Lohr received her bachelor’s and master’s degrees from
Stanford University in sociology and education, respectively,
and her PhD in Public Policy Analysis from the RAND Graduate
Institute.
For the past 30 years, Kathy has been engaged in, contributed
to, and often led nationally and internationally prominent
health services research and health policy analysis related to
improving the health outcomes of the public.
Dr. Lohr is best noted for her accomplishments in the areas
of quality of care, clinical practice guidelines, health status
assessment, and related health policy areas. In fact, Kathy has
displayed an uncanny knack for gravitating to, and leading,
efforts in seminal health policy issues of her time. She began
her health services research career at The RAND Corporation,
where she worked with such luminaries as Robert Brook and John
Ware. You might note that Dr. Ware was the first recipient of
ISPOR’s Donabedian Award.
At RAND, over a 13-year period, Kathy worked chiefly on the
landmark RAND Health Insurance Experiment and on other health
services research and policy areas mainly involving quality of
care, outcomes and health status assessment, and health
insurance as well as methods development. During this time,
Kathy contributed to the development of the “episodes of care”
methodology; evaluated the impact of EMCROs, which were the
precursors to Medicare’s Peer Review Organizations or PROs; and
pioneered the use of Medicaid claims files for use in quality
assurance.
In 1987, Kathy joined the Institute of Medicine of the
National Academy of Sciences, where she worked for 9 years.
There she directed the study titled “Medicare: A Strategy for
Quality Assurance,” which evaluated the Medicare PRO program.
This study produced the best-known and still-used definition of
quality of care in this country today. That definition is:
“Quality of care is the degree to which health services for
individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired
health outcomes and are consistent with current professional
knowledge.” The study prompted Medicare to adopt a quality
improvement orientation that has led to the work of the Quality
Improvement Organizations, the successor to the PROs. She also
directed a series of key studies for Medicare to set a research
agenda for the well-known “Effectiveness Initiative,” which
became the basis for many legislative efforts to follow
including Patient Outcomes Research Teams, or PORTs, at the then
Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR), that
populated health services research centers around the U.S.
during much of the 1990s.
During her tenure at the IOM, Dr. Lohr also codirected the
studies on clinical practice guidelines for the Agency for
Health Care Policy and Research, now the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality. One report provides the first, best-known,
and internationally used definition of clinical practice
guidelines: “systematically- developed statements to assist
practitioner and patient decisions about appropriate health care
for specific clinical circumstances.” In 1996, Kathy left
Washington D.C. with her husband Bill to join the Research
Triangle Institute - now RTI International -- where she became a
Chief Scientist and is now a Distinguished Fellow. Two years
later she joined the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
where she is now a Research Professor in the School of Public
Health.
Kathy founded and still directs the RTI-UNC Evidence-based
Practice Center funded by AHRQ. Under her leadership, the EPC
has completed more than 50 systematic reviews and updates,
including many for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
In the unlikely event that I haven’t yet convinced you of
Kathy’s extraordinary contribution to the outcomes field over
the past 30 years, let me also note that Dr. Lohr has produced
more than 50 books, monographs or government reports, 18 book
chapters, more than 100 peerreviewed journal articles, almost 30
RAND reports, and more. She is Associate Editor of Quality of
Life Research; she is or has been a member on numerous
nationally prominent committees or boards including ones for the
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations,
the US Pharmacopeia, and the Institute of Medicine and the
National Academies.
Finally, on a more personal note, both Kathy and her husband
Bill, who himself worked for years at the predecessor of AHRQ,
have been close family friends of me and my wife. She is an
absolutely lovely, unassuming woman. When I called her to tell
her she was nominated…NOMINATED… this was before she was chosen
for this award…Kathy was beside herself with disbelief and
appreciation.
Ladies and gentlemen, please join me in welcoming Dr.
Kathleen N. Lohr to the platform to receive the ISPOR Avedis
Donabedian Outcomes Research Lifetime Achievement Award.
Kathleen N. Lohr, PhD
Well, I am speechless - nearly - with delight and
appreciation, and I will try to be short. I do want to thank
Bryan, who, as he said, is a long-time family friend, and the
selection committee, and ISPOR more generally, for honoring me
with the Avedis Donebedian award. Really, nothing could give me
more pleasure. I would first like to acknowledge the source and
the motivation of this award. ISPOR has been now, for a decade,
in the forefront of health outcomes assessment, in the field of
pharmacoeconomics and by extension to public policy in the
health sector more generally. The broad set of scientists who
constitute this society’s international membership work very
hard, indeed, to translate outcomes research into clinical
practice and public health, in ways that benefit patients, their
families, providers of all types, and indeed all societies. So
it is quite fitting, I think, that ISPOR would elect to name a
lifetime achievement award in honor of one of this country’s -
but really the world’s - paramount physicians, philosophers, and
scholars.
Avedis Donebedian, for those of you who were not fortunate
enough to know him, was a tall, spare, courtly gentleman. He had
had a remarkable personal and family history that took him from
pre-World War II Lebanon, through medical training in pediatrics
and then later in public health, to become the Nathan Sinai
professor of public health at the University of Michigan in Ann
Arbor. But more relevant perhaps for today’s event, Professor
Donebedian was the seminal leader; one might rightly say the
founder, of the modern field of quality of care. He had first
articulated his breakthrough concepts that quality of care can
be parsed in terms of structure, process, and outcomes in a
seminal article published in 1966 in the Milbank Memorial Fund
Quarterly.
I note how many students are here today, so a word of sort of
instruction if you will: Professor Donebedian wrote many, many
articles, books, chapters - you name it - but he once told me
that the citation that he most liked for his work setting out
the by-now classic triad of structure, process, and outcome was
in fact that 1966 Milbank article. So if you ever have occasion
to be writing about quality of care and you want to know really
what to cite, that is it.
I think it is quite fair to say that the triad of structure,
process, and outcome is the backbone on which virtually all of
the work in quality measurement and assurance and improvement
rests today. By definition, then, the outcomes element of the
ISPOR award turns on the elegant constructs that he had
developed through tightly argued books and articles and
lectures. So an award that acknowledges those individuals who
have made major breakthroughs and contributions to improving
health outcomes is indeed rightly named after him.
Finally, I should like to mention briefly those who helped me
along the way to be standing here today and acknowledging the
advances that have been made over the years in quality of care
and outcomes research. Bryan scooped me a little, but it really
starts in the 1970s at The RAND Corporation, under the expert
guidance and unshakable support in quality of care research that
I got from Bob Brook, who had been an early protégé of Professor
Donebedian. At the same time, I was fortunate enough to have a
groundbreaking introduction into health status assessment from
John Ware, who indeed was ISPOR’s first Donebedian awardee a
couple of years ago. It then continues with my work at the
Institute of Medicine, where I had unfailing and unstinting
support from both Sam Thier and Ken Shine, the successive
presidents of the IOM while I was there, and who I think really
tried to put quality of care issues back on the national agenda
through a considerable support for a whole array of quality of
care work that, of course, continues to the very present. I also
would like to acknowledge Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality (ARHQ) in general. We have had a wonderful eight years
with our evidence-based practice center, and I am a huge fan of
all of the work that AHRQ has been able to support in that arena
and hopefully will continue to do so, including expanding our
efforts in comparative effectiveness research coming down the
road in the next couple of years. Finally, although clearly not
least, I would like to salute my husband Bill Lohr, who is here
today and as Bryan said, was himself a great supporter of health
services research and health status assessment in the years that
he was at the National Center for Health Services Research, a
precursor, a couple of agency names back, of AHRQ. And I would
like to acknowledge, as well, my sons and daughter, all of whom
have made it possible for me to stand here today and thank you,
most profoundly, for this marvelous honor. |