MEETING EVALUATION

 

1. GENERAL EVALUATION
1.1 How would you rate this Meeting? (1=Poor 10=Excellent)
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10
1.2 Did this Meeting meet your expectations?      yes     no
1.3 Did this program prove useful to your work?      
  extremely     somewhat     very little      not at all
1.4 Do you have any suggestions for next year’s Meeting?
 
1.5 Overall comments
 
   
2. PLENARY SESSIONS
2.1 How would you rate the First Plenary Session,
“New Evidence on Evidence-Based Technology Assessment in the USA vs. Canada”?
(1=Poor 10=Excellent)
  Didn't attend   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10 
2.2 How would you rate the Second Plenary Session
“Drug Safety and Risk-Benefit Decision-Making”?
(1=Poor 10=Excellent)
  Didn't attend   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10
2.3 How would you rate the Third Plenary Session
“Patient Reported Outcomes: Implementing Good Research Practices”?
(1=Poor 10=Excellent)
  Didn't attend   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10
2.4 Do you have any suggestions for next year’s Plenary Sessions topics?
 
2.5 Comments on the Plenary Sessions
 
   
3. ISSUE PANELS
  How would you rate the Issue Panels? (1=Poor 10=Excellent)
3.1 IP1: COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH: BREAKING THE METHODS MOLD
  Didn't attend   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10
3.2 IP2: IS NICE ALL THAT NASTY? COMPARISONS OF ACCESS TO CANCER THERAPY IN UK AND US HEALTH CARE
  Didn't attend   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10
3.3 IP3: ESTABLISHING KEY PRINCIPLES FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
  Didn't attend   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10
3.4 IP4: NOW WHAT FOR GENOMICS? TURNING PROMISE INTO PRACTICE
  Didn't attend   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10
3.5 IP5: PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, HEALTH-STATE UTILITIES, OR STATED-PREFERENCES? SIMILARITIES, DIFFERENCES AND ROLES IN DEMONSTRATING PRODUCT VALUE
  Didn't attend   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10
3.6 IP6: ARE GOOD PRACTICE PRINCIPLES FOR OBSERVATIONAL COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH NEEDED?
  Didn't attend   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10
3.7 IP7: WHAT DID THE MEDICARE REPLACEMENT DRUG DEMONSTRATION TEACH US ABOUT THE ROLE OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSES IN PUBLIC POLICY?
  Didn't attend   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10
3.8 IP8: QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REGULATORY RISK-BENEFIT ASSESSMENT FOR FDA DECISION-MAKING: WHAT WOULD WORK?
  Didn't attend   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10
3.9 IP9: PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS ON COVERAGE WITH EVIDENCE DEVELOPMENT: HOW WILL THE PIPER BE PAID?
  Didn't attend   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10
3.10 IP10: QALYS GONE WILD?
  Didn't attend   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10
3.11 Do you have any suggestions for future Issue Panel topics?
 
3.12 Comments on the Issue Panels
 
   
4. ISPOR FORUMS
 

How would you rate the Forums? (1=Poor 10=Excellent)

4.1 ISPOR PRO - Changing Culture or Language of a Instrument TF Forum (Monday)
Multinational trials - What translations are required, what methodology should be used and what methodology supports pooling the data?
  Didn't Attend  10
4.2 ISPOR Patient Registry SIG Forum (Monday)
Registry Design, Operations, Data & Taxonomy
  Didn't Attend  10
4.3 ISPOR Retrospective Database SIG Forum (Monday)
What You Need to Know about the ISPOR Digest of International Databases
  Didn't Attend   10
4.4 ISPOR HTA SIG Forum (Tuesday)
Navigating the Health Technology Assessment Process Around the World
  Didn't Attend   10
4.5 ISPOR Fellowship Standards TF Forum (Tuesday)
Pharmacoeconomic and Outcomes Research Fellowship Standards
  Didn't Attend   10  
4.6 ISPOR Medication Compliance & Persistence SIG Forum (Tuesday)
Assessment, Determinants & Economics of Medication Compliance & Persistence
  Didn't Attend   10  
4.7 ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis TF Forum (Tuesday)
Design and Analysis of Non-Randomized Studies of Treatment Effects using Secondary Databases
  Didn't Attend  10  
4.8 ISPOR Good Research Practices On Economic Data Transferability TF Forum (Tuesday)
Relaxing the Border Controls on Pharmacoeconomic Studies
  Didn't Attend   10 
4.9 ISPOR Quality Improvement in Cost-Effectiveness Research (QICER) TF Forum (Tuesday)
Issues and Challenges for Assessing and Improving Quality
  Didn't Attend   10 
4.10 ISPOR Student Network Educational Forum (Tuesday)
Overview of Decision Analysis and its Application
  Didn't Attend   10 
4.11 Do you have any suggestions for future Forum topics?
 
4.12 Comments on the Forums
 
   
5. PODIUM PRESENTATIONS
5.1 In general, how would you rate the Podium Presentations? (1=Poor 10=Excellent)
  Didn't attend   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10
  If attended:
5.1.1 Were the speakers knowledgeable on their topics? yes    no   
5.1.2 Were there handouts/printed materials available? yes    no   
5.1.3 Were the visual presentations clear and easy to read? yes    no   
5.1.4 Please list any comments regarding Podium Presentations
 
5.2 *New* Health Care Decisions Using Outcomes Research Information Case Studies - Podiums
In particular, how would you rate the Case Study Podiums? (1=Poor 10=Excellent)
  Didn't attend   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10
  If attended:
5.2.1 Were the speakers knowledgeable on their topics? yes    no   
5.2.2 Were there handouts/printed materials available? yes    no   
5.2.3 Were the visual presentations clear and easy to read? yes    no   
5.2.4 Please list any comments regarding Podium Presentations
 
   
6. POSTER PRESENTATIONS
6.1  In general, how would you rate the Poster Presentations? (1=Poor 10=Excellent)
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10
6.2 Were there handouts/printed materials available? yes       no
6.3 Were the visual presentations clear and easy to read? yes       no
6.4 Please list any comments regarding Poster Presentations
 
   
7. WORKSHOP PRESENTATIONS
7.1 In general, how would you rate the Workshop Presentations? (1=Poor 10=Excellent)
  Didn't attend   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10
  If attended:
7.2 Were speakers knowledgeable on their topics?    yes        no
7.3 Were there handouts/printed materials available? yes        no
7.4 Were the visual presentations clear and easy to read? yes        no
7.5 Did any workshops appear to be advertising the presenter’s company’s services or products? yes        no
 If yes, which workshops? 
7.6 Please list any comments regarding Workshop Presentations:
 
8. EXHIBITION
8.1 How would you rate the exhibits? (1=poor 5=excellent)
  1   2   3   4   5  
8.2 Were the exhibit hours long enough? (1=too short 5=too long)
  1   2   3   4   5  
   
9. ISPOR Professional Recruitment Assistance Program (PRAP) Center
9.1 Was the PRAP area useful? (1=not useful at all 5=very useful)
  Did not use   1   2   3   4   5  
   
10. MEETING MANAGEMENT
10.1 Was the Meeting well run? (1=poor 5=excellent)
  1   2   3   4   5  
10.2 Was the printed program clear and easy to follow? (1=poor 5=excellent)
    1   2   3   4   5  
   
11. FUTURE ISPOR MEETINGS AND CONGRESSES
11.1 Do you plan to attend the ISPOR 3rd Asia-Pacific Conference to be held 7-9 September 2008 in Seoul, South Korea?
  yes    no    not sure
11.2 Do you plan to attend the ISPOR 11th Annual European Congress to be held 8-11 November 2008 in Athens, Greece?
  yes    no    not sure
11.3 Do you plan to attend the ISPOR 14th Annual International Meeting to be held May 16 - 20, 2009 in Orlando, Florida, USA?
  yes    no    not sure
   
12. Participant Information
12.1 Are you a:
  Registrant
Contributed paper presenter
Media representative
Exhibitor
Other
12.2 What type of organization do you represent?
 
Academia
Managed Care/Pharmacy Benefit Management
Clinical Practice/Hospital
Health Research/Consulting/Technology Assessment
Government
Industry/Pharmaceutical/Medical Device/Diagnostic
Health Care Communications
Biotech
Student
Other ( please specify)
12.3 How long have you been working in the field of pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research?
  less than 1 year
1-2 years
2-5 years
5-10 years
10-15 years
15-20 years
more than 20 years
12.4 How many ISPOR Annual Meetings have you attended before this one?
  none   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12  
12.5 How did you first hear of this Meeting?
  ISPOR Connections
Conference Mailing
Colleague
Other  ( please specify)
12.6 Do you have any comments or suggestions for the ISPOR 14th Annual International Meeting?
 


13th Annual Meeting Main Page

Contact ISPOR @ info@ispor.org  |  View Legal Disclaimer
©2008 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions.
 
Website design by Eagle Systems USA, Inc.