 |
|
Podium Presentations |
| |
Podium Session I
MONDAY, 26 OCTOBER: 10:15 - 11:15 |
| ADHERENCE/COMPLIANCE STUDIES |
AC1 |
PERSISTENCE WITH ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUG CLASSES; INFLUENCE OF METHOD ASSUMPTIONS |
|
Nguyen NH, Vegter S, Visser ST, Postma MJ, de Jong-van den Berg LTW, Boersma C |
|
University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands |
AC2 |
SUCCESS FACTORS IMPROVING PATIENT COMPLIANCE BEHAVIOUR - EMPIRICAL FINDINGS FROM EUROPE |
|
Schäfer C |
|
Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany |
AC3 |
NON-ADHERENCE IN OUTPATIENT THROMBOSIS PROPHYLAXIS AFTER MAJOR ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY |
|
Wilke T |
|
University of Wismar, Wismar, Germany |
AC4 |
A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY OF MEDICATION ADHERENCE TO TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS IN A SWEDISH POPULATION |
|
Landfeldt E1, Borgström F1, Robbins S2, Ström O1 |
|
1i3 Innovus, Stockholm, Sweden, 2Amgen Europe GmbH, Zug, Switzerland |
| |
| CANCER STUDIES I |
CN1 |
HOW MUCH DOES ADJUSTING FOR HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE MATTER IN COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS? A COMPARISON OF COST/LIFE YEAR AND COST/QALY ESTIMATES FOR CANCER INTERVENTIONS |
|
Greenberg D, Cohen JT, Fang C, Neumann PJ |
|
Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA |
CN2 |
ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF THE CHEK2 GENOTYPING AND PERSONALIZED BREAST CANCER SCREENING IN THE POLISH HEALTH CARE SYSTEM |
|
Orlewska E1, Lubinski J2 |
|
1Centrum Farmakoekonomiki, Warsaw, Poland, 2Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland |
CN3 |
COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SORAFENIB IN UNRESECTABLE AND/OR METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA IN TURKEY |
|
Tatar M1, Akbulut H2 |
|
1Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey, 2Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey |
CN4 |
COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PEMETREXED IN FIRST LINE TREATMENT OF NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER IN PORTUGAL |
|
Pinto CG1, Manaças M2, Miguel LS3 |
|
1Technical University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal, 2Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal, 3Research Centre on the Portuguese Economy - CISEP, Lisboa, Portugal |
| |
| IMPACT OF DRUG EXPENDITURE CONTROL |
DE1 |
MARKET CONCENTRATION AND ITS CROSS-LINKAGE WITH THE
CONSUMPTION OF ACE INHIBITORS AND ARBS |
|
Zhang JX1, Tao J2
1Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA, 2Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond , VA, USA |
| |
|
DE2 |
INFLUENCE OF GENERIC DRUGS ON PROTON PUMP INHIBITOR PRESCRIPTION IN PRIMARY CARE |
|
Cammarota S1, De Portu S2, Citarella A1, Menditto E1, Cuomo R1 |
|
1University of Naples, Naples, Italy, 2University Federico II, Naples, Italy |
DE3 |
HAVE RECENT PHARMACEUTICAL REFORMS DAMAGED R&D? |
|
Trushin EF |
|
Queen Mary University of London, London, UK |
DE4 |
PRESCRIPTION DRUG FORMULARIES AND COVERAGE: DOES A DRUG BY ANY OTHER NAME SMELL AS SWEET? |
|
Hsu J, Price M, Fung V |
|
Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA |
| |
| MENTAL HEALTH - MODELING STUDIES |
MH1 |
A DISCRETE EVENT SIMULATION MODEL IN MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER – COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF AGOMELATINE |
|
Félix J1, Almeida J1, Varandas P2 |
|
1Exigo Consultores, Alhos Vedros, Lisbon, Portugal, 2Hospital dos Lusíadas, Lisbon, Portugal |
MH2 |
THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF OPPORTUNISTIC SCREENING AND MINIMAL CONTACT PSYCHOTHERAPY TO PREVENT DEPRESSION IN PRIMARY CARE PATIENTS |
|
Van den Berg M1, Smit F2, Vos T3, Van Baal P4 |
|
1National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 2Trimbos Institute (The Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 3University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 4National Institute for Public Health and the Enviroment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands |
MH3 |
ANTIPSYCHOTIC USE AND DIABETES: A NESTED CASE-CONTROL ANALYSIS IN A COHORT OF NEW ANTIPSYCHOTIC USERS |
|
Moisan J1, Desjardins O2, Turgeon M3, Grégoire JP1 |
|
1Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada, 2Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada, St-Laurent, QC, Canada, 3Faculté de pharmacie, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada |
MH4 |
COMORBID DEPRESSION IN PATIENTS DIAGNOSED WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS (T2DM): EFFECTS ON QUALITY OF LIFE AND RESOURCE USE |
|
Purayidathil FW, Gupta S, Wagner S |
|
Consumer Health Sciences International (a KantarHealth Company), Princeton, NJ, USA |
| |
| UTILITY MEASUREMENTS STUDIES |
UT1 |
VALUING EQ-5D USING TIME TRADE-OFF IN FRANCE |
|
Chevalier J1, De Pouvourville G2 |
|
1Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif Cedex, France, 2ESSEC Business School, Cergy Pontoise Cedex, France |
UT2 |
PARADIGM LOST: A CONCEPTUAL AND EMPIRICAL OBITUARY CHRONICLING THE DEMISE OF CARDINAL UTILITY MEASUREMENTNT |
|
Kind P |
|
University of York, York, UK |
UT3 |
HEALTHY-DAYS TIME EQUIVALENTS FOR OUTCOMES OF ACUTE ROTAVIRUS INFECTIONS |
|
Hauber AB1, Johnson FR1, Cook JR2, Mohamed AF1, Gonzalez JM1, Walter E3 |
|
1RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 2Merck and Co. Inc, North Wales, PA, USA, 3Duke University, Durham, NC, USA |
UT4 |
DEVELOPING AND PRELIMINARY TESTING OF AN OFFICIAL FIVE-LEVEL VERSION OF EQ-5D |
|
Herdman M1, Gudex C2, Lloyd A3, Janssen B4, Kind P5, Parkin D6, Bonsel GJ7, Badia X8 |
|
1Insight Consulting & Research, Mataró, Barcelona, Spain, 2Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark, 3Oxford Outcomes Ltd, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK, 4EuroQol Group Executive Office, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 5University of York, York, UK, 6City University, London, UK, 7Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, n/a, The Netherlands, 8IMS Health, Barcelona, Spain |
| |
Podium Session II
MONDAY, 26 OCTOBER: 14:00 - 15:00 |
| CANCER STUDIES II |
CN5 |
COSTS OFT QALYS GAINED IN A PALLIATIVE CARE UNIT (PCU) IN GERMANY |
|
Schuler US1, Schubert BT2, Haag C1 |
|
1University of Dresden, Dresden, Saxony, Germany, 2St .Joseph Stift Hospital, Dresden, Saxony, Germany |
CN6 |
TREATMENT-RELATED TOXICITIES IN PATIENTS WITH SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF THE HEAD AND NECK (SCCHN) |
|
Yood MU1, Wang F(2, Zhao Z2, Alford SH3, Oliveria S1, Wells K3, Phillips S4, Ali H3, O'Malley C5, Barber B6 |
|
1Epi Source, hamden, CT, USA, 2Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 3Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA, 4Epi Source, Hamden, CT, USA, 5Amgen, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 6Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA |
CN7 |
TREATMENT VARIATION COMPLICATES REAL-WORLD PHARMACOECONOMICS: DAILY CLINICAL PRACTICE OF BORTEZOMIB IN RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA |
|
Franken M1, Gaultney J1, Huijgens P2, Redekop W1, Uyl-de Groot C1 |
|
1Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands |
CN8 |
METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES OF CONTROL ARM ADJUSTMENTS FOR COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENTS: AN EXAMPLE BASED ON THE COMPARISON OF FIRST-LINE BEVACIZUMAB + INTERFERON ALPHA-2A VS SUNITINIB IN RENAL CELL CARCINOMA |
|
Schwander B1, Mickisch GH2, Walzer S3, Siebert U4 |
|
1AiM GmbH Assessment in Medicine, Schopfheim, Germany, 2Center of Operative Urology Bremen, Bremen, Germany, 3F. Hoffmann-La Roche Pharmaceuticals AG, Basel, Switzerland, 4UMIT – University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall i.T, Austria |
| |
| ECONOMIC EVALUATION AND REIMBURSEMENT DECISIONS I |
EE1 |
USING IQWIG'S EFFICIENCY FRONTIER APPROACH FOR THE ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF HEAPTITIS C TREATMENT – A PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDY COMMISSIONED BY IQWIG |
|
Siebert U, Mühlberger N, Conrads-Frank A, Sroczynski G, Schwarzer R |
|
UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Hall, Austria |
EE2 |
DEAR POLICYMAKER: HAVE YOU MADE UP YOUR MIND? |
|
Koopmanschap M1, Stolk E2, Koolman XH3 |
|
1Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 3Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands |
EE3 |
IS NICE TOO NASTY? A COMPARISON OF ANTICANCER DRUG COVERAGE DECISIONS IN THE UNITED STATES AND UK |
|
Mason AR1, Drummond MF1, Ramsey SD2, Campbell JD3, Raisch DW4 |
|
1University of York, York, N. Yorkshire, UK, 2Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA, 3University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 4University of New Mexico College of Pharmacy, Albuquerque, NM, USA |
EE4 |
MARKET ACCESS IN GERMANY: WHERE NEXT? |
|
Zoellner YF1, Schaefer M2 |
|
1Mapi Values, Houten, The Netherlands, 2Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany |
| |
| MODELING METHODS I |
MO1 |
COHORT MODELLING - IS THE APPROACH TOO OLD FOR THE ELDERLY? |
|
Ethgen O1, Demarteau N2, Standaert BA2 |
|
1University of Liège, Liège, Belgium, 2GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium |
MO2 |
IMPROVING COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSES OF BEHAVIOURAL INTERVENTIONS BY USING COGNITIVE INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES: A PILOT STUDY |
|
Prenger R1, Pieterse ME1, Braakman-Jansen LM1, van der Palen J2, Seydel ER1 |
|
1University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, 2Medisch Spectrum Twente Hospital, Enschede, The Netherlands |
MO3 |
R THERE ANY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN EXCEL AND R? COMPARISON OF ICER ESTIMATES AND CEACS OBTAINED FROM A MODEL IMPLEMENTED IN MICROSOFT EXCEL AND R. |
|
Bischof M, Lim ME, Ferrusi IL, Burke N, Blackhouse G, Goeree R, Tarride JE |
|
McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada |
MO4 |
BAYESIAN GENERALIZED LINEAR MODELLING OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HEALTH ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE-DISABILITY INDEX AND HEALTH UTILITIES INDEX MARK III IN EARLY AND LATE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: DATA FROM THE PREMIER AND ARMADA TRIALS |
|
Vanness D1, Roy S2, Benedict A3, Cifaldi M2 |
|
1United BioSource Corporation, Madison, WI, USA, 2Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA, 3United BioSource Corporation, London, UK |
| |
| PATIENT PREFERENCE STUDIES |
PP1 |
A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS IN HEALTH CARE DECISION MAKING |
|
Hummel JM, IJzerman MJ |
|
University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands |
PP2 |
PATIENT PREFERENCES FOR BENEFIT-RISK TRADEOFFS AMONG POST-TRANSPLANT OUTCOMES IN END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE |
|
Johnson FR1, Hauber AB1, Mohamed AF1, Gonzalez JM2 |
|
1RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 2RTI HEalth Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA |
PP3 |
WHAT DIMENSIONS ARE IMPORTANT TO PATIENTS IN THEIR EXPERIENCE OF CONTINUITY OF CARE? A STUDY OF PATIENTS' PREFERENCES USING A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT |
|
Kjaer T1, Bech M1, Draborg E1, Mollerup M2 |
|
1University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark, 2Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark |
PP4 |
LIVES WORTH LIVING: OLDER SMOKERS' STATED PREFERENCES FOR LONGEVITY |
|
Johnson FR1, Smith VK2, Smith GA3, Gonzalez JM4 |
|
1RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 2Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA, 3University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 4RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA |
| |
| VACCINES - COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS STUDIES |
VA1 |
SEVEN, TEN OR THIRTEEN? THE COST-UTILITY OF INFANT VACCINATION WITH A 7-, 10- OR 13-VALENT PNEUMOCOCCAL CONJUGATE VACCINE IN THE NETHERLANDS |
|
Vemer P1, de Greeff SC2, Schouls LM2, Al MJ1, de Melker H2
|
|
1Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2National Institute for Public Health and Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands |
VA2 |
A HEALTH ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF A NEW HERPES ZOSTER (HZ) VACCINE FOR THE PREVENTION OF HZ AND POST-HERPETIC NEURALGIA (PHN) IN BELGIUM |
|
Annemans L1, Papageorgiou M2, Martin M3, Bresse X4 |
|
1Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, 2i3 Innovus, Athens, Greece, 3i3 Innovus, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK, 4Sanofi Pasteur MSD, Lyon, France |
VA3 |
GLOBAL MEASLES ERADICATION: COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR GHANA, 2020-2049 |
|
Garrison L1, Bauch CT2, Babigumira JB1 |
|
1University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 2University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada |
VA4 |
HEALTH ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF A NOVEL INTRADERMAL INFLUENZA VACCINE IN TWO EUROPEAN COUNTRIES |
|
Reygrobellet C1, Hudeckova H2, Kristufkova Z3, Kyncl J4 |
|
1Sanofi pasteur, Lyon, France, 2Jessenius Medical Faculty Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia, Slovak Republic, 3Faculty of Public Health, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic, 4National Institute of Public Health , Praha, Praha 10, Czech Republic |
|
|
Podium Session III
MONDAY, 26 OCTOBER: 15:15 - 16:15 |
| HEALTH CARE DECISION-MAKER'S CASE STUDIES |
CASE1 |
DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING OUTCOME-BASED REIMBURSEMENT SCHEMES: EXPERIENCE FROM HUNGARY |
|
Dankó D, Molnár MP, Berta G |
|
National Health Insurance Fund Administration (OEP), Budapest, Hungary |
CASE2 |
REVIEW OF THE EARLY EXPERIENCE OF THE NEW NICE SCIENTIFIC ADVICE PROGRAMME |
|
Phillips S, Doss S, Longson C |
|
NICE, Manchester, UK |
CASE3 |
THE SLOVAK EXPERIENCE IN THE INTERNATIONAL PRICE BENCHMARKING FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUGS |
|
Filko M1, Szilagyiova P2 |
|
1Ministry of Finance of the Slovak Republic, Bratislava, Slovak Republic, 2Pfizer Slovakia, Bratislava, Slovak Republic |
CASE4 |
ASSESSMENT AND APPRAISAL IN THE NETHERLANDS |
|
Delwel GO1, Goettsch WG1, Cucic C2, Steenland E2, Terhell L2, Vingerhoed-van Aken BE2 |
|
1CVZ Healthcare Insurance Board, Diemen, The Netherlands, 2Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), The Hague, The Netherlands |
| |
|
| ECONOMIC EVALUATION AND REIMBURSEMENT DECISIONS II |
EE5 |
THE SEESAW OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS THRESHOLDS: HOW RELAXED REQUIREMENTS FOR LATER LINES OF TREATMENT WILL INCREASE HURDLES FOR NEW THERAPIES |
|
Liwing J, Lothgren M |
|
Janssen-Cilag AB, Sollentuna, Sweden |
EE6 |
INCORPORATING EQUITY IN COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW |
|
Johri M1, Norheim OF2 |
|
1Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway |
EE7 |
A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT COMPARING PUBLIC AND DECISION-MAKER STATED PREFERENCES FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SUBSIDY DECISIONS |
|
Whitty JA, Scuffham PA, Rundle-Thiele SR |
|
Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia |
EE8 |
BRIDGING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT WITH MULTICRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS (MCDA) AND AN ETHICAL FRAMEWORK FOR COMPLEX DECISIONS: CASE STUDY OF GROWTH HORMONE FOR TURNER SYNDROME |
|
Goetghebeur MM1, Wagner M1, Khoury H1, Rindress D1, Grégoire JP2, Deal C3 |
|
1BioMedCom Consultants Inc, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada, 3CHU Ste-Justine & University of Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada |
| |
| MODELING METHODS II |
MO5 |
THE USE OF SURVIVAL ANALYSES FOR COST-EFFECTIVENESS MODELS: AN EVALUATION OF METHODS USED IN NICE APPRAISALS |
|
Guyot P1, Ouwens M2 |
|
1Mapi Values Netherlands BV, Houten, The Netherlands, 2Mapi Values Netherlands B.V., Houten, The Netherlands |
MO6 |
MODELLING COST EFFECTIVENESS OF DRUGS THAT DELAY DISABILITY PROGRESSION IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: A NOVEL APPROACH |
|
Skedgel C1, Brown MG2, Andreou P1, Kirby S2 |
|
1Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada, 2Capital Health Nova Scotia, Halifax, NS, Canada |
MO7 |
EVALUATION OF A BAYESIAN COMPREHENSIVE DECISION-ANALYTICAL MODELLING FRAMEWORK IN CHRONIC HEPATITIS C |
|
Cawston H1, Aballéa S2, Cure S1 |
|
1i3 Innovus, Uxbridge, UK, 2i3 Innovus, Nanterre, France |
MO8 |
MARGINAL STRUCTURAL MODELS FOR COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE TREATMENTS IN OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES |
|
Desai R, Johnson M |
|
University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA |
| |
| PRO/QOL METHODS - CROSS CULTURAL ADAPTATION |
PR1 |
A LATENT GENERAL GROWTH MIXTURE MODEL FOR HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH PARKINSON DISEASE ACROSS 36 MONTH |
|
Reese JP1, Klotsche J2, Winter Y1, Wittchen HU2, Dodel R1 |
|
1Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany, 2Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany |
PR2 |
DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF A PEDIATRIC PERCEIVED COGNITIVE FUNCTION ITEM BANK (PEDSPCF) |
|
Lai JS1, Zelko F2, Butt Z1, Cella D1, Magasi S1, Goldman S2 |
|
1Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA, 2Children's Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA |
PR3 |
FIBROMYALGIA FATIGUE – DEVELOPMENT OF A CONCEPTUAL MODEL BASED ON QUALITATIVE PATIENT INTERVIEWS |
|
Mease P1, Humphrey L2, Arbuckle R2, Williams DA3, Danneskiold-Samsoe B4, Gilbert C5 |
|
1Seattle Rheumatology Associates, Seattle, WA, USA, 2Mapi Values Ltd, Bollington, UK, 3University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 4Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark, 5Pfizer Ltd, Sandwich, UK |
PR4 |
LINEAR SCORING RULES FOR PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES AND PATIENT PREFERENCES |
|
Mohamed AF1, Hauber AB1, Johnson FR2 |
|
1RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 2RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA |
| |
|
| VACCINES - MODELING STUDIES |
VA5 |
INDIVIDUALLY-BASED DYNAMIC MODELING OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES: COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF ADOLESCENT PERTUSSIS BOOSTER VACCINATION FOR THE NETHERLANDS |
|
de Vries R, Postma M |
|
University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands |
VA6 |
INTEGRATED DYNAMIC TRANSMISSION/COST-EFFECTIVENESS MODEL FOR INFLUENZA A AND B PART I: DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTEGRATED MODEL |
|
Pitman RJ1, Leeuwenkamp O2 |
|
1Oxford Outcomes Ltd, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK, 2MedImmune, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK |
VA7 |
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT STATIC AND DYNAMIC SIMULATION TECHNIQUES FOR THE INFLUENCE OF CHILDREN PNEUMOCOCCAL VACCINATION |
|
Endel G1, Schiller - Frühwirth I1, Popper N2,
Zauner G2, Breitenecker F3 |
|
1Hauptverband der Österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger, Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 2DWH - Simulation Services, Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 3Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Vienna, Austria |
VA8 |
HOW SHOULD HEALTH GAINS OF VACCINATION STRATEGIES BE DISCOUNTED? |
|
Westra TA1, Rogoza R2, Daemen T1, Wilschut JC1, Postma MJ3 |
|
1University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, 2i3 Innovus, Burlington, ON, Canada, 3University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands |
|
|
Podium Session IV
MONDAY, 26 OCTOBER: 16:30 - 17:30 |
| COST STUDIES |
CO1 |
ESTIMATE AVERAGE MEDICAL COSTS IN THE PRESENCE OF RIGHT-CENSORING |
|
Guan S1,
Peeters P2, Pedotti P1, Van Engen AK1 |
|
1Quintiles Consulting, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands, 2Quintiles Consulting, Levallois-Perret, France |
CO2 |
WITHDRAWN |
|
|
|
|
CO3 |
INDIRECT SOCIAL COST OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: RESULTS FROM A REAL-WORLD OBSERVATIONAL STUDY |
|
Kirzinger S1, Halper J2, Jeffery D3, Preblick R4, Bi YJ4, Bharmal M5, Jo H5 |
|
1University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA, 2MS Center at HNH, Teaneck, NJ, USA, 3Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA, 4Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Health Economics, Outcome and Reimbursement (HEOR), Wayne, NJ, USA, 5Quintiles, Inc., Falls Church, VA, USA |
CO4 |
MICRO-COSTING VS GROSS-COSTING IN THE ESTIMATION OF COSTS FOR THE PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATION OF GLAUCOMA IN KOREA |
|
Kang SH, Lee EK |
|
SookMyung Women's University, Seoul, South Korea |
| |
| DIABETES STUDIES |
DB1 |
USING POPULATION-BASED ESTIMATES FOR DISEASE MODELING: POTENTIAL BIAS COMPARED TO USING DISEASE-SPECIFIC DEATH AND COMPLICATION RISK ESTIMATES |
|
Goeree R, Lim ME, Hopkins R, Blackhouse G, Tarride JE, Xie F, O'Reilly D |
|
McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada |
DB2 |
PERSISTENCE WITH BASAL SUPPORTED ORAL THERAPY - COMPARISON OF INSULIN GLARGINE VERSUS NPH INSULIN |
|
Quinzler R1, Ude M2, Franzmann A1, Feldt S1, Leuner K2, Mueller WE2, Dippel FW3, Schulz M4 |
|
1GIDE - German Institute for Drug Use Evaluation (DAPI), Eschborn, Hessen, Germany, 2Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany, 3Sanofi-Aventis, Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 4ABDA - Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists, Berlin, Berlin, Germany |
DB3 |
USING ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS TO IDENTIFY UNDIAGNOSED DIABETES MELLITUS IN PRIMARY CARE PRACTICES |
|
Marelli C1, Cload P2, Ross S3, Kallenbach L4, Haas S5, Gunnarsson C6, Zyczynski T7
|
|
1GE HealthCare LTD, Bucks, Giles Bucks, England, 2GE HealthCare LTD, Bucks, Bucks, England, 3SDRoss Consulting, Cohasset, MA, USA, 4GE Healthcare Clinical Data Services, Plano, TX, USA, 5s2 Statistical Solutions, Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA, 6S2 Statistical Solutions, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 7GE Healthcare, Princeton, NJ, USA |
DB4 |
RISK OF STROKE OR MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION OF T2DM PATIENTS TREATED WITH PIOGLITAZONE OR NON-THIAZOLIDINEDIONE IN A MANAGED CARE SETTING IN THE UNITED STATES |
|
Sun SX1, Vallarino C2, Xu Y1, Kupfer S2, Bron M1 |
|
1Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc, Deerfield, IL, USA, 2Takeda Global Research and Development Center, Inc, Deerfield, IL, USA |
| |
| MODELING METHODS - HANDLING UNCERTAINTY |
MO9 |
HANDLING UNCERTAINTY IN THE CASE OF COMBINED END-POINTS |
|
Heeg BMS1, Treur MJ2, van Hout BA3 |
|
1Pharmerit Europe, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2PharMerit Europe, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands, 3Pharmerit Ltd, York, North Yorkshire, UK |
MO10 |
EARLY MODELLING: METHODS IN THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PRE-PHASE II PRODUCTS |
|
Taylor M, Saxby R |
|
University of York, York, UK |
MO11 |
WHEN DOES VALUE OF INFORMATION ANALYSIS ADD VALUE? |
|
Ishak KJ1, Getsios D2, Caro JJ2 |
|
1United BioSource Corporation, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2United BioSource Corporation, Lexington, MA, USA |
MO12 |
COMPARISON OF THREE META-MODELS FOR UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS |
|
Lieuw On MML1, Heeg BMS2, De Charro F2, van Hout BA3 |
|
1Pharmerit, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands, 2Pharmerit Europe, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 3Pharmerit Ltd, York, North Yorkshire, UK |
| |
| PRO/QOL METHODS - DEVELOPMENT |
PR5 |
TRANSLATION AND LINGUISTIC VALIDATION: EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THAT AN IN-COUNTRY REVIEW IS NECESSARY |
|
Gergovich KB, Houchin C, Wild D |
|
Oxford Outcomes Ltd, Oxford, UK |
PR6 |
PRESENTATION OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ISOQOL TRANSLATION AND CULTURAL ADAPTATION SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP (TCA-SIG) |
|
Conway K1, Patrick DL2, Martin M3, Eremenco S4, Petkova I1 |
|
1MAPI Research Trust, Lyon, France, 2University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 3Health Research Associates, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA, 4Evanston Northwestern Healthcare Research Institute, Evanston, IL, USA |
PR7 |
EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF TRANSLATING PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES |
|
McKenna SP1, Hagell P2, Hedin PJ3, Nyberg L2 |
|
1Galen Research, Manchester, UK, 2Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 3Central Hospital, FALUN, Sweden |
PR8 |
VALIDATION OF THE PROQOL-HIV QUESTIONNAIRE IN LIGHT OF CROSS-CUTURAL DIFFERENCES FROM 5 CONTINENTS |
|
Duracinsky M1, Acquadro C2, Lalanne C2, Herrmann S3, Berzins B4, Lecoeur S5, Diouf A6, Fournier-Nicolle I7, Lau J8, Schechter M9, Chassany O10 |
|
1Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bicetre, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, France, 2Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France, 3Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia, 4Northwestern University, Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, 5Programme for HIV Prevention and Treatment (PHPT), Chiang Mai, Thailand, 6Centre de Recherche Clinique de Fann (CRCFP), Dakar, Senegal, 7Hôpital Calmette, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 8Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, 9Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 10Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France |
| |
|
| WILLINGNESS TO PAY STUDIES |
WP1 |
COMPARISON OF A DIRECT AND AN INDIRECT METHOD TO DERIVE WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR COMPLEX HEALTH STATES IN OBSTETRICS |
|
Bijlenga D1, Bonsel GJ2, Birnie E2 |
|
1Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands |
WP2 |
VALUE OF POSTOPERATIVE ACUTE PAIN CARE FOR PATIENTS OPERATED BY LAPAROTOMY IN A DEPARTMENT OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY IN A FRENCH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL: A WILLINGNESS TO PAY STUDY |
|
Bocquet F1, Thiriat N1, Beaussier M1, Aissou M1, Preziosi C1, Borget I2, Tilleul P1 |
|
1St-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France, 2Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France |
WP3 |
ASSESSING THE WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY (WTP) FOR INTRADERMAL INFLUENZA VACCINATION IN AUSTRALIA USING DISCRETE CHOICE METHODOLOGY |
|
Adams J1, Price N2, Mason G3 |
|
1IMS Health, St Leonards, NSW, Australia, 2Sanofi-Aventis, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 3Sanofi Pasteur, Sydney, NSW, Australia |
PCV137 |
PREFERENCES OF PATIENTS, PHYSICIANS AND CAREGIVERS IN THE
CHOICE OF ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS TREATMENT OPTIONS:
THE PREFER STUDY |
|
Scalone L1, Borghetti F2, Faggioli G3, Stella A3, Cortesi P2, Mantovani LG4 |
|
1University of Milan – Bicocca, Milan, Italy, 2University of Milan, Milan, Italy, 3Sant'Orsola Malpighi Hospital-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, 4University of Naples, Federico II, Naples, Italy |
|
|