GENERAL INFORMATION:
Abstract submissions are
invited for CONTRIBUTED RESEARCH, CONTRIBUTED WORKSHOPS, AND CONTRIBUTED ISSUES
PANELS
-
ALL ABSTRACTS MUST BE SUBMITTED THROUGH ISPOR’S ONLINE
ABSTRACT SYSTEM VIA
WWW.ISPOR.ORG.
-
All abstract submissions and presentations must be in
English.
-
Annual
Congress registration is required for all presenters.
-
Expenses associated with the submission and presentation
of an abstract are the responsibility of the presenter.
-
The presenters of research are required to disclose
financial support. Abstract review will NOT be based on this information.
-
The abstract, excluding title and author information,
should be no longer than 300 words.
-
The use of tables and graphs in your abstract submission
is not allowed.
- ALL
ABSTRACTS MUST BE SUBMITTED BY
20 JUNE
2005.
CONTRIBUTED RESEARCH SUBMISSION INFORMATION
GENERAL INFORMATION:
-
Research abstracts (except Methods & Concept abstracts)
must be organized as follows: OBJECTIVES: METHODS: RESULTS: CONCLUSIONS:
-
Research on all diseases is considered. Study methods
include, but are not limited to, conjoint analysis, large database analysis,
quasi-experimental analysis, literature or record review, modeling,
naturalistic (observational) studies, randomized clinical trials and
surveys.
-
Research on all health care interventions is considered
including drugs, behavioral modification, disease prevention, gene therapy,
medical device, screening, diagnostic procedures, dietary, health education,
radiation therapy, and surgical procedures.
-
Reviews or methods papers are also considered as
research abstracts.
-
Any human experimentation must conform to the principles
of the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association (Clin
Res.1992; 40: 653-660).
-
Accepted abstracts will be published AS SUBMITTED in
Value in Health and distributed at the Annual
Congress. Changes to abstracts will not be accepted after the
Submission Deadline, therefore, they should be carefully written and edited
prior to submission.
-
Abstracts accepted at a prior ISPOR meeting are NOT accepted.
-
Research RESULTS must be included for an abstract to be
considered for presentation.
-
See Research
Abstract Example
TOPICS FOR RESEARCH SUBMISSIONS:
Research submissions on the following topics are considered:
-
Clinical Outcomes Studies (COS)
-
Cost Studies (CS)
-
Patient Reported Outcomes:
QoL, PP, WTP, Utilities, Work/Patient/Treatment
Satisfaction & Compliance/Persistence
-
Health Care Use & Policy Studies (HP)
-
Methods and Concepts (MC)
|
CLINICAL OUTCOMES STUDIES (COS) |
HEALTH CARE USE & POLICY
STUDIES (HP) |
|
Efficacy/Effectiveness (EE)
Co-morbidities (CM)
Adverse Events (SE)
Diagnosis (D)
Survival (S)
Risk Factors (RF)
Prevalence/Incidence (PV) |
Consumer Role in Health Care (CRH)
Diagnosis Related Group (DRG)
Disease Management (DISM)
Drug or Devices & Health Policy (DHP)
Drug Use (DU)
Equity and Access (EA)
Formulary Development/PharmacyBenefit (FD)
Health Care Reimbursement (HR)
Health Care Expenditure (HE)
Health Care Management (including pharmaceutical care) (HM) Health Care
Information (HI)
Health Care Research (HCR)
Medical Devices/Diagnostics (MD)
Patient/Provider/Payer/Regulator/Researcher Education (PE)
Patient Registries (PR)
Pharmacogenomics (PG)
Post Marketing Studies (PMS)
Prescribing Behavior (PB)
Productivity/Work Performance (PWP)
Quality of Care/Quality Improvement (QC)
Regulation of Health Care Sector (RHS)
Treatment Patterns / Guidelines (TPG) |
|
COST STUDIES (CS) |
|
Budget Impact (BI)
Cost-Benefit Analysis (CB)
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CE)
Cost-Efficiency Analysis (CEE)
Cost-consequence (CN)
Cost-Minimization Analysis (CM)
Cost-Utility Analysis (CU)
Cost of Illness (CoI)
Cost of Treatment (CoT)
Cost Comparison (CC)
Productivity/Work Performance (PI)
Resource Use (RU) |
|
PATIENT
REPORTED OUTCOMES:
QoL, PP, WTP, Utilities, Work/Patient/Treatment
Satisfaction & Compliance/Persistence |
METHODS AND CONCEPTS (MC) |
|
Quality-of-Life (hrQoL)
Health Status (HS)
Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)
Willingness-to-Pay (WTP)
Patient Preference (PP)
Patient Satisfaction (PS)
Treatment Satisfaction (TS)
Adherence/Compliance/Persistence (AD)
|
Clinical Outcomes Studies
(CO)
Costs Studies including CE/CB/CU, resources use, and productivity (CS)
Database Studies & Management (DM)
Study & Methods Design-General (SD)
Modeling Studies (MS)
Patient Registry (PR)
Quality of Life / PRO / Utility / Preference Studies (QOL) |
DISEASE/DISORDER FOR RESEARCH
SUBMISSIONS:
When submitting your abstract, you
must select the DISEASE/ DISORDER that best describes your research. If no
disease or multiple diseases apply to your abstract, select Multiple Diseases/No
Specific Disease. If the disease is not listed, select Other.
- Allergy
- Arthritis-Osteoarthritis
- Arthritis-Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Arthritis-Other
- Asthma
- Cancer
- Cardiovascular Disease-Angina /Ischemia/Coronary Syndrome
- Cardiovascular Disease-Angioplasty
- Cardiovascular Disease-Arrhythmia
- Cardiovascular Disease-Atrial Fibrillation
- Cardiovascular Disease-Congestive Heart Failure / Heart Failure
- Cardiovascular Disease-Coronary Artery Disease
- Cardiovascular Disease-Hypercholesterolemia
- Cardiovascular Disease-Hypertension
- Cardiovascular Disease-Left Ventricular Dysfunction (LVD)
- Cardiovascular Disease-Myocardial Infarction
- Cardiovascular Disease-Peripheral Arterial Disease
- Cardiovascular Disease-Stents
- Cardiovascular Disease-Thrombosis including DVT
- Cardiovascular Disease-Multiple disorders
- Cardiovascular Disease-Other
- Diabetes
- Endocrine Disorders-other (Pituitary Gland/Thyroid)
- Eye
- Ear
- GI Disorders (including Dyspepsia, GERD, Irritable Bowel, Liver, Ulcers)
- Health, Women’s
- Health, Men’s
- Health, Children’s
- Health, Elderly
- Hematological Disorders |
- Infection
(including leg ulcers & bronchitis)
- Infection-HIV
- Infection-influenza
- Infection-vaccine
- Mental Health-Alcoholism / Drug Abuse
- Mental Health-Anxiety
- Mental Health-Attention Deficit Disorder
- Mental Health-Bi-Polar Disorder
- Mental Health-Depression
- Mental Health-Dementia
- Mental Health-Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
- Mental Health-Psychosis
- Mental Health-Schizophrenia
- Mental Health-Other
- Muscular-skeletal Disorders including Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
- Neurological Disorders-Alzheimer’s Disease
- Neurological Disorders-Epilepsy
- Neurological Disorders-Cystic Fibrosis
- Neurological Disorders-Migraine
- Neurological Disorders-Multiple Sclerosis
- Neurological Disorders-Parkinson’s Disease
- Neurological Disorders-Sleep Disorders
- Neurological Disorders-Other
- Obesity
- Osteoporosis (inluding falls, injuries, bone disorders)
- Pain
- Respiratory Disorders (including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [COPD])
- Skin (including hair loss)
- Smoking
- Stroke
- Urinary/Kidney (including Renal Disease, Irritable Bladder Syndrome)
- Surgery
- Multiple Diseases/No Specific Disease |
CRITERIA
FOR EVALUATION OF RESEARCH ABSTRACTS:
Quality
Of Study Criteria:
(For Research Study Abstracts)
Note:
For studies involving data
collection or analysis, the abstract will be REJECTED if RESULTS are NOT
included.
- Research design is appropriate and transparent.
- Data sources are appropriate and transparent.
- Data analyses are appropriate and transparent.
- Results ARE INCLUDED and are transparent and comprehensible.
- Conclusions are consistent with the results.
Quality Of Methods And Concept:
(For Methods and Concepts Abstracts)
- Approach to method and/or concept is apparent.
- Approach represents advancement or is innovative.
- Practical implications/recommendations provided.
- Papers do NOT need to be organized: Objectives: Methods: Results:
Conclusions:
Quality of the Abstract Presentation Criteria:
- Objectives/research questions are clearly stated and objectives are
addressed.
- Factual information is kept separate from interpretations or implications /
unbiased presentation.
- Implications/results, as presented, are easy to understand.
Impact Factor & Public Awareness
- Impact Factor - The reviewer will rate the abstract on a scale of 1
- 5 (1 =low impact ; 5=very high impact ) if the study results described in
the abstract will have an impact on health care decisions by health care
decision-makers and/or patients.
- Public Awareness - The reviewer will indicate (yes, no, or no
comment) whether the results of this study will contribute to the health care
improvement of society and the public should be made aware of the study
results reported in this abstract.
ABSTRACT REVIEW PROCESS AND
NOTIFICATION OF AUTHORS:
-
All research abstracts will be peer reviewed by at least
3-blinded reviewers.
-
Research abstracts will be evaluated based on the
criteria listed below.
-
All presenters will be notified by email by
2 August, 2005.
PRESENTATION OF RESEARCH ABSTRACTS:
PODIUM PRESENTATIONS
-
All oral presentations will be programmed into 15-minute
time slots. You will have 12 minutes for presentation and 3 minutes for
questions and discussion. It is important that you not exceed 15 minutes.
Financial support for the research must be presented at the beginning of the
presentation.
-
Audiovisual equipment: An LCD projector and laptop
computer will be provided. Slide projection or overhead transparency
projection are not allowed.
-
YOU ARE REQUIRED TO BRING AT LEAST 100 HANDOUTS OF YOUR
PRESENTATION MATERIAL.
-
Presenter MUST email electronic slides NOT LESS THAN 10
DAYS in advance of the
Congress to the ISPOR office at
podium@ispor.org.
POSTER PRESENTATIONS
-
At least one author must be present during the Author
Discussion Hour given below
Poster Presentation Timetable:
|
Session I Poster Presentations |
Session II Poster Presentations |
Poster Set-up:
Poster Display Hours:
Author Discussion Hour:
Dismantle:
|
Sun, 6 Nov
11:30-12:00
Sun, 6 Nov 12:00-Mon, 7 Nov 14:00
Sun, 6 Nov 18:00-19:00
Mon, 7 Nov 19:30 |
Poster Set-up:
Poster Display Hours:
Author Discussion Hour:
Dismantle:
|
Mon, 7 Nov
16:30- 17:00
Mon, 7 Nov 16:30- 17:00
Mon, 7 Nov 18:00- 19:00
Tue, 8 Nov 17:00- 17:30 |
-
The abstract title and authors must be placed at the top
of the board, and the lettering must be at least 1 inch high. A copy of
the abstract, typed in large print, must be placed in the upper left
hand corner of the board. Subtitles should correspond to those used in
your abstract submission. Illustrations, charts, tables, lettering, and
drawings must be readable from distances of at least three feet.
Financial support must be displayed at the lower right hand corner of
the board.
-
Mounting materials will be available on-site.
-
YOU ARE REQUIRED TO BRING AT LEAST 100 HANDOUTS OF YOUR
PRESENTATION MATERIAL.
CONTRIBUTED WORKSHOP
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
-
Contributed Workshop are designed to share novel and
innovative experiences in either the conduct of pharmacoeconomics and
outcomes research studies or the interpretation and use of pharmacoeconomics
outcomes information in health care policy development.
-
Workshop submissions must be organized as follows:
Workshop Purpose: Description:
-
Accepted Workshop Submissions are published AS SUBMITTED
in the
Congress Final Program.
-
See workshop example
TOPICS FOR
WORKSHOP SUBMISSIONS:
Workshop submissions are accepted on the following TOPICS:
Workshop submissions are accepted on the following TOPICS:
-
Clinical study methodology
issues including pharmacoepidemiology (COS)
-
Cost study methodology
issues (CS)
-
Quality of life study
methodology issues including patient reported outcomes (QOL)
-
Preference-based studies
methodology issues including utility studies (PS)
-
Drug/device coverage
research issues (FS)
-
Health care policy
development issues using outcomes research (HP)
-
Risk assessment/risk
management issues (RK)
-
Compliance issues (CMP)
-
Patient registries development issues (PR)
WORKSHOP
REVIEW PROCESS AND NOTIFICATION OF AUTHORS:
-
All contributed workshops are peer reviewed by at least
3 reviewers (not blinded).
-
Contributed Workshop submissions will be evaluated based
on relevance and completeness of information presented based on the
Contributed Workshop Criteria given below.
-
Authors will be notified no later than
20 July, 2005,
regarding
abstract acceptance and placement in the Annual
Congress program.
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF CONTRIBUTED WORKSHOPS:
Workshop acceptance is based on the quality of the submission and the topic
for discussion
-
The workshop objective(s) are clearly stated.
-
The objective(s) can be achieved in the 60 minutes
allotted for this workshop.
-
The information / issue(s) presented are novel or
innovative.
-
The information / issue(s) presented is valuable to the
pharmacoeconomic &
outcomes researcher or the health care decision-maker.
-
There is an audience interactive element in the
workshop.
-
The workshop does NOT appear to be advertising the
presenter’s company’s services or products.
-
PLEASE NOTE:
Abstracts accepted at prior meetings will NOT be accepted
PRESENTATION OF CONTRIBUTED WORKSHOP ABSTRACTS:
-
All workshops will be programmed into 60-minute time
periods.
-
A single presenter or multiple presenters may present
workshops.
-
A minimum of 15 minutes of structured audience
participation is required.
-
Visual equipment: an LCD projector and screen will be
provided in each room. However, YOU MUST BRING YOUR OWN LAPTOP COMPUTER.
CONTRIBUTED ISSUE
PANEL SUBMISSION INFORMATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
Contributed Issues Panels
are designed to stimulate real debate on new or controversial issues in health
economic/pharmacoeconomic and outcomes research or use of outcomes research in
health care decision-making.
-
An Issue Panel is composed of a moderator and 1 to 2
panelists.
-
To assure lively debate, panelists and/or moderator
should be from different institutions and/or work environments representing
different perspectives to the debate.
-
Panelists should present distinct views about the topic
-
Issue Panel submissions abstracts must be organized as
follows:
|
• Title: Full title of your Issue Panel (showing the debate issue in the
title is recommended) |
|
• Moderator and/or Contact Person: Name, degrees,
position, and full contact information for the Moderator of the
Issue Panel |
|
• Panelists: Names, degrees, positions, and full contact information for the
Issue Panelists. A maximum of three panelists is suggested. Each panelist
should represent a different point of view.
|
|
• Issue: A clear definition of the issue should be described indicating the
perspectives to be presented (with panelists named for each perspective) |
|
• Overview: Background information on the issue(s) should be included.
|
-
Accepted abstracts are published AS SUBMITTED in the
Congress Final Program.
-
See Issue Panel Example
TOPICS FOR ISSUE PANEL SUBMISSION
Issue Panel submissions are accepted on (but not excluded to) the following
topics:
ISSUE PANEL
SUBMISSION REVIEW PROCESS AND NOTIFICATION OF AUTHORS:
-
Contributed Issue Panel
submissions are reviewed by at least 3 reviewers and the Issue Panel
Chair(s)
-
Proposals
will be evaluated based on topic, relevance to
Congress theme and completeness of information presented based on the
criteria given above
-
Authors will be notified
no later than
20
July 2005, regarding abstract acceptance and placement in the Annual
Congress program.
CRITERIA
FOR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRIBUTED ISSUE PANEL
-
Is the issue clearly defined?
-
Is more than 1 perspective identified?
-
Is the background information (included in the overview)
clear and concise?
-
Is there time allotted for audience discussion and
debate?
-
PLEASE
NOTE:
Abstracts
accepted at prior meetings will NOT be accepted
PRESENTATION OF CONTRIBUTED ISSUE PANELS
-
All Issues Panels will be 60 minutes.
-
20-30 minutes of audience participation is required
-
An LCD projector screen and microphones will be
provided. However, YOU MUST BRING YOUR OWN LAPTOP COMPUTER.
Online Abstracts Submission System
|