COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS IN A UK SETTING OF SELF MONITORING OF BLOOD GLUCOSE IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE-2 DIABETES
Palmer AJ1, Dinneen S2, Gavin III JR3, Gray A4, Herman WH5, Karter AJ6
1CORE - Center for Outcomes Research, Binningen, Switzerland;
2National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland; 3Emory
University School of Medicine and Morehouse School of Medicine, Fairburn,
GA, USA; 4University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; 5University of Michigan, Ann
Arbor, MI, USA; 6Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA
OBJECTIVES: Self monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) has been
shown to improve glycemic control of type 2 diabetes in previous studies
(HbA1c improved by 0.3-0.6% with SMBG versus no SMBG, depending on
treatment received) However, the cost of testing supplies is high and
cost-effectiveness has not been evaluated. METHODS: A validated
model (CORE Diabetes model) projected improvements in lifetime
qualityadjusted life years (QALY), long-term costs, and
cost-effectiveness of SMBG versus no SMBG. Markov/Monte Carlo modeling
simulated progression of complications (cardiovascular, neuropathy,
renal and eye disease). Transition probabilities and HbA1c-dependent
adjustments came from
UKPDS and other major studies. Costs of complications came from
published sources. Direct costs of diabetes complications and SMBG were
projected over patients' lifetimes from a UK National Health Service
perspective. Outcomes were discounted at 3.5% annually. Sensitivity
analysis was performed. RESULTS: Depending on the type of
diabetes treatment (diet and exercise/oral medications/insulin),
improvements in glycemic control with SMBG improved discounted QALYs by
0.12±0.14 to 0.21±0.14, with increased total costs of £603±909 to
£2,240±1,124/patient, giving incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of
£4,853 to £10,670/QALY gained, well within current UK willingness-to-pay
limits. At a threshold of £30,000/QALY gained, there was a 78-85%
probability that SMBG would be considered cost-effective. SMBG was most
cost-effective in the subgroup of patients treated with diet and
exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in glycemic control with
interventions including SMBG improves patient outcomes with an
acceptable cost-effectiveness ratio in the UK setting.