PRO Task Force: Use of Existing Instruments and their Modification


Goal:
Development of good research practices for assessing existing instruments for use in label claim studies, identifying the concepts contained in existing instruments, obtaining patient input if not used in original instrument, development of instruments used in a battery and modification of these instruments including use in new measurement concept, use in new population, change in item content, and assessment of measurement properties for revised instruments.

Chair: Margaret Rothman, PhD,
Executive Director, WW Patient-reported Outcomes Center of Excellence, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Services, LLC, Washington, GA, USA

13th Annual International Meeting Presentation

Third Plenary:  Patient Reported Outcomes: Implementing Good Research Practices

Plenary Presentation
Plenary Program

Workshop 10: Patient Reported Outcomes – Selecting, Evaluating and Documenting Support for Existing Instruments for Labeling Claims: Content Validity

Wednesday, May 7 8:30 – 9:30 AM in the Essex Ballroom (Mezzanine Level)
Workshop Presentation
Workshop Program

Leadership Team:
Laurie B. Burke, RPh, MPH, Director, Study Endpoints and Label Developments, Office of New Drugs, CDER, FDA, Washington, DC
Pennifer Erickson, PhD, Founder, OLGA, State College, PA
Nancy Kline Leidy, PhD, Senior Vice President of Scientific Affairs, United BioSource, Bethesda, MD
Donald Patrick, PhD, MSPH, Professor, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Charles Petrie, PhD, Senior Director/Group Leader, Worldwide Outcomes Research – Neurosciences, Groton, CT

Background:
A wide variety of Health Technology Assessors at different levels of the health system and a number of other stakeholders in medical product use consider PRO studies of efficacy and effectiveness of medical products. Although formal guidelines may not be available, good research practices in PRO development are important in improving the value of this information to decision-makers.

In July 2005, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use of the European Medicines Agency issued a Reflection Paper on the Regulatory Guidance for the Use of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Measures in the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. Recommendations of this Paper came into effect January 2006. The scope of the EMEA document was to discuss the place that a HRQL type of PRO may have in the drug evaluation process and to give some broad recommendations on its use in the context of already existing guidance documents. The EMEA reflection paper and existing documents also point out the need for standardization of research practices in the evaluation of medical products using PROs.

In February 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a draft version of Guidance for Industry titled “Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims.”

Draft FDA Guidance for Industry - Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims Draft Guidance

Chapter IV: Evaluating PRO Instruments, Part D: Modification of an Existing Instrument:

When a PRO instrument is modified, additional validation studies may be needed to confirm the adequacy of the modified instrument’s measurement properties. The extent of additional validation recommended depends on the type of modification made. For example, small nonrandomized studies may be adequate to assess the results of changing a response scale from vertical to horizontal. On the other hand, if the PRO instrument is to be used in an entirely new population of patients, a small randomized study to ascertain the measurement properties in the new population may minimize the risk that the instrument will not perform adequately in a phase 3 study.

The FDA intends to consider a modified instrument as a different instrument from the original and will consider measurement properties to be version-specific. The FDA recommends additional validation to support the development of a modified PRO instrument when one or more of the following modifications occur.

The adequacy of a PRO instrument depends on the developmental history and demonstrated measurement properties. Sponsors need to identify all endpoint measurement goals to provide the basis for approval or claim substantiation. If sponsors determine that no existing instrument is applicable or adequate for their product, they can develop or modify an existing instrument. The FDA generally plans to evaluate the modified instrument in the same way that it evaluates a new instrument. It is important to have documentation supporting the original development process, modifications made and updated assessment of the measurement properties.

The FDA identifies 5 specific issues to address when modifying an existing PRO instrument:

  1. Revised Measurement Concept
  2. Application to a New Population or Condition
  3. Changed Item Content or Instrument Format
  4. Changed Mode of Administration
  5. Changed Culture or Language of Application
This Task Force will address the first three issues in its development of good research practices for assessing existing instruments for use in label claim studies, identifying the concepts contained in existing instruments, obtaining patient input if not used in original instrument, development of instruments used in a battery and modification of these instruments including use in new measurement concept, use in new population, change in item content, and assessment of measurement properties for revised instruments.

The final two issues are addressed by the PRO Task Forces bearing those names.


Task Forces Index

Use of Existing Instruments and their Modification TF Members Access Only

  How to login

User name: first part of the email address (before @)
e.g. for jdoe@ispor.org it should be jdoe)
Password: ISPOR Member ID.

   Click here for login help

Contact ISPOR @ info@ispor.org  |  View Legal Disclaimer
©2008 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions.
 
Website design by Eagle Systems USA, Inc.