Pharmacoeconomic Guidelines Around The World

Country: British Medical Journal, Region: Northern Europe

Submission Guidelines
Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the British Medical Journal, 1996

Submission Guidelines Source:

References:


Submission Guidelines Key Features:
Key Features:  
Title and year of the DocumentGuidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the British Medical Journal, 1996 
Affiliation of authorsAcademia 
Main policy objectiveFor authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the British Medical Journal 
Standard reporting format includedTen sections under three headings: study design, data collection, and analysis and interpretation of results 
DisclosureNot stated 
Target audience of funding/ author’s interestsAuthors and peer reviewers of economic evaluation 
PerspectiveAdvocate: societal. 
IndicationEmphasis on research question 
Target populationNot stated 
Subgroup analysisNot stated 
Choice of comparatorMost widely used. Most cost-effective currently available 
Time horizonLong enough to capture all the differential effects of the options. 
Assumptions requiredYes 
Preferred analytical techniqueAny one of CMA, CCA, CEA, CUA, CBA 
Costs to be includedDepends on the viewpoint chosen 
Source of costsFrom finance department of particular institution or from national statistics 
ModelingYes, requires details 
Systematic review of evidencesYes 
Preference for effectiveness over efficacyYes 
Preferred outcome measureDetails should be given of the methods used 
Preferred method to derive utilityDetails should be given of the methods used 
Equity issues statedNot stated 
Discounting costsYes, Between 3~6%, commonly 5% 
Discounting outcomes0% or one lower than that used for costs, keep transparency 
Sensitivity analysis-parameters and rangeUncertain variables from population, use CI; others, use threshold analysis, analysis of extremes. 
Sensitivity analysis-methodsOne-way, multi-way SA, probabilistic SA. 
Presenting resultsMajor outcomes (direct costs, indirect costs, life years gained, improvement of quality of life) should be presented in a disaggregated form before being combined in an aggregated form (a single index or ratio). 
Incremental analysisYes 
Total C/EYes 
Portability of results (Generalizability)Generalizability is important 
Financial impact analysisNo 
Mandatory or recommended or voluntary 

Country Selection Page  |  PE Guidelines Index Page

Contact ISPOR @ info@ispor.org  |  View Legal Disclaimer
©2010 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions.
 
Website design by Eagle Systems USA, Inc.